From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E6DF1F1508 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 14:43:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737470625; cv=none; b=ljcuua0IZnhVHDgD3tPbjW2alwTRmHULIPLvrzErZ+faT84lta/xoYDBNKquVN/tRwvnZJwM+f/l7vLaqIq3rvs1egqZ4jrzYhIWKzilP6qyV+Tj7giN9iVU1Oza+00SaRIcm162R6R8mUcx8NZzMEG7HkEXl1cbKqbh3JTpkZk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737470625; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OY50ZguIBzRsOVPbQOk93Sa5ytCfUt5W8ZLPHNu6ZV0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=F18VNfeBHc8pzG0Vu/QcZEmQiedEDtaJY095N3QJw6YYTLe1j5zpRFlzKfxrMCqlln+m93k6B9Nlf0rNR2KKUonLBfKg/p6PHQkf/gB97guGLTbrjJ6flPwer55Xp+50fzEPiA6uc9avRLQfP2HzflMj+ciZDZNkMHUFsMunbB4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=DVeyyImI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="DVeyyImI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1737470623; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2W7asi9HRh4r0ivC++MeqiIIQQRprVDeUn0WV1tUD9E=; b=DVeyyImIwDgA9esgZR12z/+0RrAJFpbAh3swJOJHRDfsy5UxlAnkWSfLPDyEKAqJDH1uQ6 ZDeCT42Rk7VBQIJYXYvygBL4HyFR37WpgDs6E5MZJbkVhBFiR4WXFlcBzodwYAP1fA6H8m Nf4iQWdaIoGNODQz1nAJ92+q2j3yROI= Received: from mail-qv1-f69.google.com (mail-qv1-f69.google.com [209.85.219.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-631-vW1_83zcPky48-pQP8e7Lw-1; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:43:41 -0500 X-MC-Unique: vW1_83zcPky48-pQP8e7Lw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: vW1_83zcPky48-pQP8e7Lw Received: by mail-qv1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6e1e06456c1so20235366d6.1 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 06:43:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737470621; x=1738075421; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2W7asi9HRh4r0ivC++MeqiIIQQRprVDeUn0WV1tUD9E=; b=gE8K3sMGGk7herhGw0BL7oToLTsOHRyxbY/bDfF0VqPCDDL5CCQ5+x0/1fx0nBaIyB viaOVFvL0XBH4Sdbts+Oeonk8PxXNyozuusbPzKefx7eD3Kzfr3Atb+eHPr2mQ0410Oy MNR4PD0mDJgO8krCyIG8BxDTi2o2YG6HvfFk0Fxo7zy7XwsMsnE/nWupiUlcv74PobtD eHljAz8kquZv+h1PqhyeFtgpVmw+e3aYQLbOq4uWq6sSKQo/F3V8doQAWaV0dTDRzaW5 RN2oqr1S1hkMeaaXxZRZHmkCCP1Z8ncaAHBbNM4BbO16iZzi2Notx/OzJyNi9ykt+HHi 7MDA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWr+expctuc7Yj1KDFbVZtV5tdfjT0T+FfyNrb/uAt/V+nkzkL4P7lUAoRcqxcKKozLeabpHLKPUM1YQxQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxFXPRVxjwYou+h8aXapzKV06NvnDpalo7/eat+LLeYIGBSMV9l hVJtYk4PkbUP7UtUSbnQl/pQAs93pyM0SDnp48685ko2cvDeHJnyekbEy/mkVwv2i2ANgtN+mwI b/dhWfV4XtmouyAB0ox0hC//f6Bwe7iyI7xG8/asIp4ar4LElV7NYdf3hGieckg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncviAYRhsehBir2FwoLTyQAk4BVwWf97mNgbV+nTZ15/JPj55o+XXwzkRhdG4Eb qd0qKYN7dH9NZCzFHrTPBnDWipDhOBJPZbzD7afJ7ymfU3J8oMBqbLa6blEDnDI26uNjFHfuglg u+4x24svkwVFNf81D3uJWqkvbmnYXwZxt2wR+uzIfmqjk8vprjGWLxlS4q74+S5IpcFPfaadvqj LFpNNiDBe5oRKu1BAeg1Rvg6hNvyHxCWMp45NYjokauc+9IGWPRa2WtWuHGQbTbeYhIb69FpcP6 YfHfowV9LzKDOYKHyFEf3Bok6B/XLBUo/p4+6J2sMcFq1gNTLCd/Sis= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:d4b:b0:6e1:728c:a5d2 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6e1b2732a91mr265004546d6.6.1737470621445; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 06:43:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHPg2wACA4e32ElLFEXRS3jAfr5GTh3ckinlRuDB3gw6M1OzCWuweMZKgYO32Q7nSEj0LsYnA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:d4b:b0:6e1:728c:a5d2 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6e1b2732a91mr265004286d6.6.1737470621179; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 06:43:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.110] (bras-base-aylmpq0104w-grc-14-70-52-22-87.dsl.bell.ca. [70.52.22.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-6e1afce883bsm51588986d6.108.2025.01.21.06.43.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jan 2025 06:43:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:43:33 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree To: Jens Axboe , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton Cc: Pavel Begunkov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List References: <20250110124406.17190e3a@canb.auug.org.au> <20250121183922.48b19f85@canb.auug.org.au> <054a35c4-a604-4afa-8288-13cae3f74286@redhat.com> <48d04a52-8f84-44c3-bf14-95fe9a3e9e06@kernel.dk> Content-Language: en-US, en-CA From: Luiz Capitulino In-Reply-To: <48d04a52-8f84-44c3-bf14-95fe9a3e9e06@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2025-01-21 09:40, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 1/21/25 6:57 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: >> On 2025-01-21 02:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:44:06 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> >>>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >>>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: >>>> >>>> io_uring/memmap.c: In function 'io_region_allocate_pages': >>>> io_uring/memmap.c:173:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'alloc_pages_bulk_array_node'; did you mean 'alloc_pages_bulk_node'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >>>>    173 |         nr_allocated = alloc_pages_bulk_array_node(gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE, >>>>        |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>        |                        alloc_pages_bulk_node >>>> >>>> Caused by commit >>>> >>>>    1e21df691ffa ("io_uring/memmap: implement kernel allocated regions") >>> >>> That commit is now in Linus' tree. >>> >>>> interacting with commit >>>> >>>>    4f6a90a13f78 ("mm: alloc_pages_bulk: rename API") >>> >>> That is now commit >>> >>>    8c3cbdcf4d82 ("mm: alloc_pages_bulk: rename API") >>> >>> in the mm-stable tree. >> >> Should I resend against latest Linus tree? I thought we were going with >> your fixup... > > As long as it gets mentioned when the pull request goes out, Linus is > usually quite happy to just fix it up while merging. Cool, thanks Jens.