From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Huang Jiaqing <jiaqing.huang@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:06:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be26926a-5843-46c6-a0b9-c51b5d8e29fc@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e59f6ba0-a289-4c3f-8746-b58f9474a35b@linux.intel.com>
On 2/19/2024 2:58 PM, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 2024/2/19 14:54, Ethan Zhao wrote:
>> On 2/15/2024 3:22 PM, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>> The existing IO page fault handler currently locates the PCI device by
>>> calling pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(). This function searches the list
>>> of all PCI devices until the desired device is found. To improve lookup
>>> efficiency, a helper function named device_rbtree_find() is introduced
>>> to search for the device within the rbtree. Replace
>>> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() in the IO page fault handling path.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Huang Jiaqing <jiaqing.huang@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Huang Jiaqing <jiaqing.huang@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 1 +
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 14 ++++++--------
>>> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
>>> index 54eeaa8e35a9..f13c228924f8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
>>> @@ -1081,6 +1081,7 @@ void free_pgtable_page(void *vaddr);
>>> void iommu_flush_write_buffer(struct intel_iommu *iommu);
>>> struct iommu_domain *intel_nested_domain_alloc(struct iommu_domain
>>> *parent,
>>> const struct iommu_user_data *user_data);
>>> +struct device *device_rbtree_find(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 rid);
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
>>> void intel_svm_check(struct intel_iommu *iommu);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> index 09009d96e553..d92c680bcc96 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> @@ -120,6 +120,35 @@ static int device_rid_cmp(struct rb_node *lhs,
>>> const struct rb_node *rhs)
>>> return device_rid_cmp_key(&key, rhs);
>>> }
>>> +/*
>>> + * Looks up an IOMMU-probed device using its source ID.
>>> + *
>>> + * If the device is found:
>>> + * - Increments its reference count.
>>> + * - Returns a pointer to the device.
>>> + * - The caller must call put_device() after using the pointer.
>>> + *
>>> + * If the device is not found, returns NULL.
>>> + */
>>> +struct device *device_rbtree_find(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 rid)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device_domain_info *info;
>>> + struct device *dev = NULL;
>>> + struct rb_node *node;
>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->device_rbtree_lock, flags);
>>
>> Though per iommu device rbtree isn't a big tree, given already holds
>> spin_lock
>> why still needs irq off ?
>
> I want it to be usable not only in the normal execution flow, but also
> in the interrupt context, such as for the DMA remapping fault
> (unrecoverable) reporting path.
Holding rbtree_lock only should work in interrrupt context, I missed something ?
But with irq_off, as side effect, telling all the CPUs not to handle interrrupt
that moment.
Thanks,
Ethan
>
> Best regards,
> baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-15 7:22 [PATCH 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices Lu Baolu
2024-02-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu " Lu Baolu
2024-02-15 17:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-18 4:22 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19 2:45 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-19 4:04 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19 5:33 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-19 6:47 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19 7:24 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path Lu Baolu
2024-02-15 17:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-18 7:02 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-21 15:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-21 7:04 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-21 7:37 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19 6:54 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-19 6:58 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19 7:06 ` Ethan Zhao [this message]
2024-02-19 7:22 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be26926a-5843-46c6-a0b9-c51b5d8e29fc@linux.intel.com \
--to=haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiaqing.huang@intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®