From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: wenst@chromium.org, rafael@kernel.org
Cc: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@icenowy.me>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal/of: support thermal zones w/o trips subnode
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:23:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be7ad677-f7e3-4eab-8b7e-1c375eed3ef7@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241028171901.2484882-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
On 28/10/2024 18:19, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> From: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@icenowy.me>
>
> Although the current device tree binding of thermal zones require the
> trips subnode, the binding in kernel v5.15 does not require it, and many
> device trees shipped with the kernel, for example,
> allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi and mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi in ARM64, still
> comply to the old binding and contain no trips subnode.
>
> Allow the code to successfully register thermal zones w/o trips subnode
> for DT binding compatibility now.
>
> Furtherly, the inconsistency between DTs and bindings should be resolved
> by either adding empty trips subnode or dropping the trips subnode
> requirement.
>
> Fixes: d0c75fa2c17f ("thermal/of: Initialize trip points separately")
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@icenowy.me>
> [wenst@chromium.org: Reworked logic and kernel log messages]
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241018073139.1268995-1-wenst@chromium.org
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
In order to fix a conflict when merging this patch I did the following
changes. Let me know if you [dis]agree with the changes
This change will go through the 'fixes' branch, so for v6.12
Thanks
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
> index a4caf7899f8e..07e09897165f 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
> @@ -99,18 +99,15 @@ static struct thermal_trip *thermal_of_trips_init(struct device_node *np, int *n
> struct device_node *trips;
> int ret, count;
>
> + *ntrips = 0;
> +
> trips = of_get_child_by_name(np, "trips");
> - if (!trips) {
> - pr_err("Failed to find 'trips' node\n");
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> - }
> + if (!trips)
> + return NULL;
>
> count = of_get_child_count(trips);
> - if (!count) {
> - pr_err("No trip point defined\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out_of_node_put;
> - }
> + if (!count)
> + return NULL;
>
> tt = kzalloc(sizeof(*tt) * count, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!tt) {
> @@ -133,7 +130,6 @@ static struct thermal_trip *thermal_of_trips_init(struct device_node *np, int *n
>
> out_kfree:
> kfree(tt);
> - *ntrips = 0;
> out_of_node_put:
> of_node_put(trips);
>
> @@ -401,11 +397,14 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_of_zone_register(struct device_node *
>
> trips = thermal_of_trips_init(np, &ntrips);
> if (IS_ERR(trips)) {
> - pr_err("Failed to find trip points for %pOFn id=%d\n", sensor, id);
> + pr_err("Failed to parse trip points for %pOFn id=%d\n", sensor, id);
> ret = PTR_ERR(trips);
> goto out_of_node_put;
> }
>
> + if (!trips)
> + pr_info("No trip points found for %pOFn id=%d\n", sensor, id);
> +
> ret = thermal_of_monitor_init(np, &delay, &pdelay);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("Failed to initialize monitoring delays from %pOFn\n", np);
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-28 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-18 7:31 [PATCH v4] " Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-18 16:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-10-28 17:19 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Lezcano
2024-10-28 17:23 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2024-10-29 3:14 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be7ad677-f7e3-4eab-8b7e-1c375eed3ef7@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=uwu@icenowy.me \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®