Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field

[hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com>]

Hi Marcelo

Thanks for the suggestion

Will consider that

B.R.

Jia


On 9/6/16 8:44 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:30:03AM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> ...
>> v2:
>> - 1/6 fix bug in udplite statistics.
>> - 1/6 snmp_seq_show is split into 2 parts
>>
>> Jia He (6):
>>    proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show
>>    proc: Reduce cache miss in snmp6_seq_show
>>    proc: Reduce cache miss in sctp_snmp_seq_show
>>    proc: Reduce cache miss in xfrm_statistics_seq_show
>>    ipv6: Remove useless parameter in __snmp6_fill_statsdev
>>    net: Suppress the "Comparison to NULL could be written" warning
> Hi Jia,
>
> Did you try to come up with a generic interface for this, like
> snmp_fold_fields64() (note the fieldS) or snmp_fold_field64_batch() ?
>
> Sounds like we have the same code in several places and seems they all
> operate very similarly. They have a percpu table, an identified max, a
> destination buffer..
>
> If this is possible, this would reduce the possibility of hiccups in a
> particular code.
>
>    Marcelo
>
>