From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>, <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
<chao@kernel.org>, <yunlong.song@icloud.com>
Cc: <miaoxie@huawei.com>, <bintian.wang@huawei.com>,
<shengyong1@huawei.com>, <heyunlei@huawei.com>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: issue discard align to section in LFS mode
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:40:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bec2c80d-13ca-e6be-f73a-ee8c6e9f6462@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532005095-111878-1-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com>
On 2018/7/19 20:58, Yunlong Song wrote:
> For the case when sbi->segs_per_sec > 1 with lfs mode, take
> section:segment = 5 for example, if the section prefree_map is
> ...previous section | current section (1 1 0 1 1) | next section...,
> then the start = x, end = x + 1, after start = start_segno +
> sbi->segs_per_sec, start = x + 5, then it will skip x + 3 and x + 4, but
> their bitmap is still set, which will cause duplicated
> f2fs_issue_discard of this same section in the next write_checkpoint:
>
> round 1: section bitmap : 1 1 1 1 1, all valid, prefree_map: 0 0 0 0 0
> then rm data block NO.2, block NO.2 becomes invalid, prefree_map: 0 0 1 0 0
> write_checkpoint: section bitmap: 1 1 0 1 1, prefree_map: 0 0 0 0 0,
> prefree of NO.2 is cleared, and no discard issued
>
> round 2: rm data block NO.0, NO.1, NO.3, NO.4
> all invalid, but prefree bit of NO.2 is set and cleared in round 1, then
> prefree_map: 1 1 0 1 1
> write_checkpoint: section bitmap: 0 0 0 0 0, prefree_map: 0 0 0 1 1, no
> valid blocks of this section, so discard issued, but this time prefree
> bit of NO.3 and NO.4 is skipped due to start = start_segno + sbi->segs_per_sec;
>
> round 3:
> write_checkpoint: section bitmap: 0 0 0 0 0, prefree_map: 0 0 0 1 1 ->
> 0 0 0 0 0, no valid blocks of this section, so discard issued,
> this time prefree bit of NO.3 and NO.4 is cleared, but the discard of
> this section is sent again...
>
> To fix this problem, we can align the start and end value to section
> boundary for fstrim and real-time discard operation, and decide to issue
> discard only when the whole section is invalid, which can issue discard
> aligned to section size as much as possible and avoid redundant discard.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Thanks,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-24 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-17 14:04 [PATCH] " Yunlong Song
2018-07-18 2:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Yunlong Song
2018-07-19 12:58 ` [PATCH v3] " Yunlong Song
2018-07-24 2:40 ` Chao Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bec2c80d-13ca-e6be-f73a-ee8c6e9f6462@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=bintian.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=heyunlei@huawei.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
--cc=shengyong1@huawei.com \
--cc=yunlong.song@huawei.com \
--cc=yunlong.song@icloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®