From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>,
paulmck@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com,
frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
josh@joshtriplett.org, urezki@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
lianux.mm@gmail.com
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@gmail.com,
will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun@kernel.org,
npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk,
luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com, dlustig@nvidia.com,
joelagnelf@nvidia.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
rdunlap@infradead.org, longman@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, qiang.zhang@linux.dev,
brads@mainlining.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, lkmm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 02/15] hazptr: use Bloom filter for shared scan waiters
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 01:51:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bedc399a-151c-42e5-b33e-d78221702fa5@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005171529.1378809-3-kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
On 2026-10-05 13:15, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> Replace the per-waiter exact-match scan with a shared Bloom filter
> built during the second drain pass: each observed non-wildcard
> address sets three bits, so a waiter whose address hashes to an
> unset bit can be completed without another slot walk.
>
> A Bloom filter has no false negatives, so an address absent from
> the final drain scan cannot be held by an observed slot; false
> positives only delay completion to a later scan cycle.
>
> The filter uses a one-page bitmap with three multiply-shift hash
> functions. It lives in the hazptr_scan_state and is only touched
> by the scan kthread, so waiter state remains on the caller's stack
> and no dynamic allocation is needed.
>
> Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
I actually suggested that to Boqun in the first place. Feel
free to add my suggested-by tag as well. :)
Did you run your Bloom filter in a test program on the side to
see how it behaves with pointers, and confirm that the false
positive rate is not too high due to hashing algorithm/constants
concerns ?
Thanks!
Mathieu
> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/hazptr.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/hazptr.c b/kernel/hazptr.c
> index 9e274a691af5..900ba35de2cb 100644
> --- a/kernel/hazptr.c
> +++ b/kernel/hazptr.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/hazptr.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/percpu.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/swait.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
>
> /*
> * The current hazard pointer wildcard. Flips between 1UL and 2UL to guarantee
> @@ -213,6 +215,55 @@ void hazptr_scan_period(void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
> }
> }
>
> +/* Number of hash functions for the Bloom filter. */
> +#define HAZPTR_BLOOM_HASHES 3
> +
> +/* Number of bits in the Bloom filter bitmap: one page. */
> +#define HAZPTR_BLOOM_NBITS (PAGE_SIZE * 8)
> +
> +struct hazptr_bloom {
> + unsigned long map[PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(unsigned long)];
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Multiply @addr by a per-hash odd constant and use the high bits
> + * as the Bloom filter index.
> + */
> +static unsigned long hazptr_bloom_hash(void *addr, unsigned int i)
> +{
> + static const u64 mult[HAZPTR_BLOOM_HASHES] = {
> + 0x9E3779B97F4A7C15ULL,
> + 0xC2B2AE3D27D4EB4FULL,
> + 0x165667B19E3779F9ULL,
> + };
> + u64 hash = (u64)(unsigned long)addr * mult[i];
> +
> + return hash >> (64 - ilog2(HAZPTR_BLOOM_NBITS));
> +}
> +
> +static void hazptr_bloom_reset(struct hazptr_bloom *bloom)
> +{
> + bitmap_zero(bloom->map, HAZPTR_BLOOM_NBITS);
> +}
> +
> +static void hazptr_bloom_add(struct hazptr_bloom *bloom, void *addr)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < HAZPTR_BLOOM_HASHES; i++)
> + __set_bit(hazptr_bloom_hash(addr, i), bloom->map);
> +}
> +
> +static bool hazptr_bloom_contains(const struct hazptr_bloom *bloom, void *addr)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < HAZPTR_BLOOM_HASHES; i++)
> + if (!test_bit(hazptr_bloom_hash(addr, i), bloom->map))
> + return false;
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> struct hazptr_waiter {
> struct list_head node;
> void *addr;
> @@ -226,17 +277,26 @@ struct hazptr_scan_state {
> struct mutex lock;
> struct list_head pending;
> struct list_head scanning; /* kthread only */
> + struct hazptr_bloom bloom; /* kthread only */
> };
> static struct hazptr_scan_state hazptr_scan;
>
> /*
> - * Check per-CPU slots before overflow-list slots to match the
> - * acquisition ordering of promoted slots.
> + * Walk all slots and return true if @watch is present. If @bloom
> + * is non-NULL, record observed non-wildcard addresses in it.
> + *
> + * Per-CPU slots are examined before overflow-list slots on each CPU
> + * to preserve the acquisition ordering required by the promote path:
> + * synchronize must observe the per-CPU slot release before the
> + * overflow-list entry can be missed.
> */
> -static bool hazptr_value_present(void *val)
> +static bool hazptr_scan_walk(void *watch, struct hazptr_bloom *bloom)
> {
> int cpu;
>
> + if (bloom)
> + hazptr_bloom_reset(bloom);
> +
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> struct hazptr_percpu_slots *percpu_slots = per_cpu_ptr(&hazptr_percpu_slots, cpu);
> struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = per_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip, cpu);
> @@ -244,10 +304,14 @@ static bool hazptr_value_present(void *val)
>
> for (idx = 0; idx < NR_HAZPTR_PERCPU_SLOTS; idx++) {
> struct hazptr_slot_item *item = &percpu_slots->items[idx];
> + void *v;
>
> /* Pairs with smp_store_release in hazptr_release(). */
> - if (smp_load_acquire(&item->slot.addr) == val)
> + v = smp_load_acquire(&item->slot.addr);
> + if (v == watch)
> return true;
> + if (bloom && v && !is_wildcard(v))
> + hazptr_bloom_add(bloom, v);
> }
> for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> struct hazptr_overflow_list *list = &overflow_list_flip->array[i];
> @@ -256,11 +320,16 @@ static bool hazptr_value_present(void *val)
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&list->lock, flags);
> hlist_for_each_entry(b, &list->head, overflow_node) {
> + void *v;
> +
> /* Pairs with smp_store_release in hazptr_release(). */
> - if (smp_load_acquire(&b->slot.addr) == val) {
> + v = smp_load_acquire(&b->slot.addr);
> + if (v == watch) {
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list->lock, flags);
> return true;
> }
> + if (bloom && v && !is_wildcard(v))
> + hazptr_bloom_add(bloom, v);
> }
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list->lock, flags);
> }
> @@ -276,7 +345,7 @@ static bool hazptr_value_present(void *val)
> */
> static void hazptr_drain_wildcard(void *wc)
> {
> - while (hazptr_value_present(wc))
> + while (hazptr_scan_walk(wc, NULL))
> cond_resched();
> }
>
> @@ -309,12 +378,16 @@ static void hazptr_scan_do_cycle(void)
> WRITE_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard, scan_wildcard);
> old_wildcard = flip_wildcard(scan_wildcard);
>
> - /* Pass 2: drain the old wildcard. */
> - hazptr_drain_wildcard(old_wildcard);
> + /*
> + * Pass 2: drain the old wildcard while collecting observed
> + * addresses into the Bloom filter.
> + */
> + while (hazptr_scan_walk(old_wildcard, &hazptr_scan.bloom))
> + cond_resched();
>
> - /* Complete waiters whose address is no longer held by any slot. */
> + /* Complete waiters whose address is not in the filter. */
> list_for_each_entry_safe(w, n, &hazptr_scan.scanning, node) {
> - if (!hazptr_value_present(w->addr))
> + if (!hazptr_bloom_contains(&hazptr_scan.bloom, w->addr))
> list_move(&w->node, &done);
> }
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 17:15 [PATCH RFC v3 00/15] hazptr: batch synchronize operations through a shared scan Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/15] hazptr: add shared scan kthread Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/15] hazptr: use Bloom filter for shared scan waiters Kunwu Chan
2026-10-06 5:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2026-10-06 6:13 ` KunWu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/15] hazptr: scan all per-CPU slots before overflow lists Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/15] hazptr: add scoped_guard() support Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/15] hazptr: add debug option to force the acquire slow path Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/15] hazptr: elide redundant first drain pass Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/15] Documentation/litmus-tests: add hazptr wildcard-flip escape test Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/15] locking/lockdep: use hazptr to wait for dynamic key lookups Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/15] rcuscale: add hazptr scale type Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/15] hazptr: fix kernel-doc of hazptr_release() Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/15] Documentation/litmus-tests: add hazptr acquire-before-scan test Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/15] hazptrtorture: add slowpath and lockdep scenarios Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 13/15] hazptrtorture: add READERS4 and READERS0 torture configs Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 14/15] hazptrtorture: add 128- and 256-CPU configs Kunwu Chan
2026-10-05 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC v3 15/15] selftests/rcutorture: add hazptr torture test script Kunwu Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bedc399a-151c-42e5-b33e-d78221702fa5@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=brads@mainlining.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkmm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®