From: Prashanth K <prashanth.k@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ferry Toth <ftoth@exalondelft.nl>,
Ricardo B Marliere <ricardo@marliere.net>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Elson Roy Serrao <quic_eserrao@quicinc.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Set is_suspend flag if remote wakeup fails
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:24:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf19304a-c9b7-4647-b33f-cf5e771cfa83@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025021436-seizing-prankish-ebf2@gregkh>
On 14-02-25 01:30 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 03:38:40PM +0530, Prashanth K wrote:
>> Currently while UDC suspends, u_ether attempts to remote wakeup
>> the host if there are any pending transfers. However, if remote
>> wakeup fails, the UDC remains suspended but the is_suspend flag
>> is not set. And since is_suspend flag isn't set, the subsequent
>> eth_start_xmit() would queue USB requests to suspended UDC.
>>
>> To fix this, bail out from gether_suspend() only if remote wakeup
>> operation is successful.
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Fixes: 0a1af6dfa077 ("usb: gadget: f_ecm: Add suspend/resume and remote wakeup support")
>> Signed-off-by: Prashanth K <prashanth.k@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c
>> index 09e2838917e2..f58590bf5e02 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c
>> @@ -1052,8 +1052,8 @@ void gether_suspend(struct gether *link)
>> * There is a transfer in progress. So we trigger a remote
>> * wakeup to inform the host.
>> */
>> - ether_wakeup_host(dev->port_usb);
>> - return;
>> + if (!ether_wakeup_host(dev->port_usb))
>> + return;
>
> What about the other place in the driver where this function is called
> but the return value is ignored?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Other than above one, eth_start_xmit() tries to remote wakeup host when
we have some data to send from n/w layer. In that case we try to wakeup
host and directly return NETDEV_TX_BUSY to caller. If remote wakeup
succeeds, then resume() would call netif_start_queue() which again lets
n/w layer to queue skb. Hence we don't have to check for ret of
ether_wakeup_host() in that case.
Regards,
Prashanth K
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-14 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-12 10:08 Prashanth K
2025-02-14 8:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-02-14 8:54 ` Prashanth K [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf19304a-c9b7-4647-b33f-cf5e771cfa83@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=prashanth.k@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ftoth@exalondelft.nl \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_eserrao@quicinc.com \
--cc=ricardo@marliere.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®