mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Honghui Zhang (张洪辉)" <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
	<treding@nvidia.com>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<youlin.pei@mediatek.com>, <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <kendrick.hsu@mediatek.com>,
	<kernel@pengutronix.de>, <arnd@arndb.de>, <tfiga@google.com>,
	<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <erin.lo@mediatek.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <djkurtz@google.com>,
	<p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] iommu/mediatek: add support for mtk iommu generation one HW
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 19:26:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf2077e7-da8f-ba27-4f75-999c007f36b4@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5731B7D8.8040304@arm.com>

hi, Robin, thanks very much for your comments.

On 5/10/2016 6:28 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 09/05/16 09:00, honghui.zhang@mediatek.com wrote:
> [...]
>> +static void *mtk_iommu_alloc_pgt(struct device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
>> +{
>> +    dma_addr_t dma;
>> +    void *pages = alloc_pages_exact(size, gfp | __GFP_ZERO);
>> +
>> +    if (!pages)
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    dma = dma_map_single(dev, pages, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>> +    if (dma_mapping_error(dev, dma))
>> +        goto out_free;
>> +    /*
>> +     * We depend on the IOMMU being able to work with any physical
>> +     * address directly, so if the DMA layer suggests otherwise by
>> +     * translating or truncating them, that bodes very badly...
>> +     */
>> +    if (dma != virt_to_phys(pages))
>> +        goto out_unmap;
> 
> Given that you've only got a single table to allocate, and at 4MB it has a fair chance of failing beyond early boot time, just use dma_alloc_coherent() - you don't need to care about the dma <-> phys relationship because you don't have multi-level tables to walk. That way, you can get rid of all the awkward streaming DMA stuff, and also benefit from CMA to avoid allocation failures.
> 

thanks, use dma_alloc_coherent is good for me.

>> +    kmemleak_ignore(pages);
>> +    return pages;
>> +
>> +out_unmap:
>> +    dev_err(dev, "Cannot accommodate DMA translation for IOMMU page tables\n");
>> +    dma_unmap_single(dev, dma, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>> +out_free:
>> +    free_pages_exact(pages, size);
>> +    return NULL;
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void mtk_iommu_free_pgt(struct device *dev, void *pages, size_t size)
>> +{
>> +    dma_unmap_single(dev, (dma_addr_t)virt_to_phys(pages),
>> +             size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>> +    free_pages_exact(pages, size);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int mtk_iommu_domain_finalise(struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
>> +{
>> +    struct mtk_iommu_domain *dom = data->m4u_dom;
>> +
>> +    spin_lock_init(&dom->pgtlock);
>> +
>> +    dom->pgt_va = mtk_iommu_alloc_pgt(data->dev,
>> +                dom->pgt_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!dom->pgt_va)
>> +        return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +    dom->pgt_pa = virt_to_phys(dom->pgt_va);
>> +
>> +    writel(dom->pgt_pa, data->base + REG_MMU_PT_BASE_ADDR);
>> +
>> +    dom->cookie = (void *)data;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct iommu_domain *mtk_iommu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
>> +{
>> +    struct mtk_iommu_domain *dom;
>> +
>> +    if (type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    dom = kzalloc(sizeof(*dom), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!dom)
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * MTK m4u support 4GB iova address space, and oly support 4K page
>> +     * mapping. So the pagetable size should be exactly as 4M.
>> +     */
>> +    dom->pgt_size = SZ_4M;
> 
> If the table size is fixed, then why bother having a variable at all?
> 
>> +    return &dom->domain;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void mtk_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>> +{
>> +    kfree(to_mtk_domain(domain));
>> +}
>> +
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +static int mtk_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>> +             phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size, int prot)
>> +{
>> +    struct mtk_iommu_domain *dom = to_mtk_domain(domain);
>> +    struct mtk_iommu_data *data = dom->cookie;
>> +    unsigned int page_num = size >> MTK_IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT;
> 
> Since you only advertise a single page size, this will always be 1, so you could either get rid of the loop here...
> 

I would prefer your following advise to change the pgsize_bitmap. 
I would follow your advise in the next version.
Thanks very much.

>> +    unsigned long flags;
>> +    unsigned int i;
>> +    u32 *pgt_base_iova;
>> +    u32 pabase = (u32)paddr;
>> +    int map_size = 0;
>> +
>> +    spin_lock_irqsave(&dom->pgtlock, flags);
>> +    pgt_base_iova = dom->pgt_va + (iova  >> MTK_IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +    for (i = 0; i < page_num; i++) {
>> +        pgt_base_iova[i] = pabase | F_DESC_VALID | F_DESC_NONSEC;
>> +        pabase += MTK_IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE;
>> +        map_size += MTK_IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE;
>> +    }
>> +    dma_sync_single_for_device(data->dev,
>> +            dom->pgt_pa + (iova >> MTK_IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT),
>> +            (size >> MTK_IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT) * sizeof(u32),
>> +            DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>> +    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dom->pgtlock, flags);
>> +
>> +    mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_range(data, iova, size);
>> +
>> +    return map_size;
>> +}
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +static struct iommu_ops mtk_iommu_ops = {
>> +    .domain_alloc    = mtk_iommu_domain_alloc,
>> +    .domain_free    = mtk_iommu_domain_free,
>> +    .attach_dev    = mtk_iommu_attach_device,
>> +    .detach_dev    = mtk_iommu_detach_device,
>> +    .map        = mtk_iommu_map,
>> +    .unmap        = mtk_iommu_unmap,
>> +    .map_sg        = default_iommu_map_sg,
>> +    .iova_to_phys    = mtk_iommu_iova_to_phys,
>> +    .add_device    = mtk_iommu_add_device,
>> +    .remove_device    = mtk_iommu_remove_device,
>> +    .device_group    = mtk_iommu_device_group,
>> +    .pgsize_bitmap    = MTK_IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE,
>> +};
> 
> ...or perhaps advertise .pgsize_bitmap = ~0UL << MTK_IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT here, so you actually can handle multiple entries at once for larger mappings - given how simple the page table format is that doesn't seem too unreasonable, especially since it should give you a big efficiency win in terms of TLB maintenance.
> 
> Robin.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-12 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-09  8:00 [PATCH 0/5] MT2701 iommu support honghui.zhang
2016-05-09  8:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: mediatek: add descriptions for mediatek mt2701 iommu and smi honghui.zhang
2016-05-09 20:22   ` Rob Herring
2016-05-10  1:13     ` Honghui Zhang (张洪辉)
2016-05-09  8:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/mediatek: move the common struct into header file honghui.zhang
2016-05-09  8:00 ` [PATCH 3/5] memory/mediatek: add support for mt2701 honghui.zhang
2016-05-09  8:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] iommu/mediatek: add support for mtk iommu generation one HW honghui.zhang
2016-05-10 10:28   ` Robin Murphy
2016-05-12 11:26     ` Honghui Zhang (张洪辉) [this message]
2016-05-12 12:41     ` Honghui Zhang
2016-05-09  8:00 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701 honghui.zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bf2077e7-da8f-ba27-4f75-999c007f36b4@mediatek.com \
    --to=honghui.zhang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=djkurtz@google.com \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=erin.lo@mediatek.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kendrick.hsu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tfiga@google.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®