mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Belloni	 <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
	 Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
	Will McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com>,
	Juan Yescas	 <jyescas@google.com>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
		kernel-team@android.com,
	Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@disroot.org>,
		linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
		linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: sec: drop now unused struct sec_pmic_dev::irq_data
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 14:38:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf9e08adfa72ff873baca60fc437a2f85f447a1e.camel@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251120103553.GZ1949330@google.com>

Hi Lee,

On Thu, 2025-11-20 at 10:35 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2025, André Draszik wrote:
> 
> > This was used only to allow the s5m RTC driver to deal with the alarm
> > IRQ. That driver now uses a different approach to acquire that IRQ, and
> > ::irq_data doesn't need to be kept around anymore.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/sec-common.c         |  5 +++--
> >  drivers/mfd/sec-core.h           |  2 +-
> >  drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c            | 10 ++--------
> >  include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h |  1 -
> >  4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-common.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-common.c
> > index 77370db52a7ba81234136b29f85892f4b197f429..794c4e5398e7dd1a816aff9a6559a6c19fec75a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-common.c
> > @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ sec_pmic_parse_dt_pdata(struct device *dev)
> >  int sec_pmic_probe(struct device *dev, int device_type, unsigned int irq,
> >  		   struct regmap *regmap, struct i2c_client *client)
> >  {
> > +	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> >  	struct sec_platform_data *pdata;
> >  	const struct mfd_cell *sec_devs;
> >  	struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic;
> > @@ -187,7 +188,7 @@ int sec_pmic_probe(struct device *dev, int device_type, unsigned int irq,
> >  
> >  	sec_pmic->pdata = pdata;
> >  
> > -	ret = sec_irq_init(sec_pmic);
> > +	ret = sec_irq_init(sec_pmic, &irq_data);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > @@ -240,7 +241,7 @@ int sec_pmic_probe(struct device *dev, int device_type, unsigned int irq,
> >  				     sec_pmic->device_type);
> >  	}
> >  	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic->dev, -1, sec_devs, num_sec_devs,
> > -				   NULL, 0, regmap_irq_get_domain(sec_pmic->irq_data));
> > +				   NULL, 0, regmap_irq_get_domain(irq_data));
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.h b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.h
> > index 92c7558ab8b0de44a52e028eeb7998e38358cb4c..c639180ea686f4308af3f872cb1d2209d201b2e7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.h
> > @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ int sec_pmic_probe(struct device *dev, int device_type, unsigned int irq,
> >  		   struct regmap *regmap, struct i2c_client *client);
> >  void sec_pmic_shutdown(struct device *dev);
> >  
> > -int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic);
> > +int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic, struct regmap_irq_chip_data **irq_data);
> >  
> >  #endif /* __SEC_CORE_INT_H */
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
> > index c5c80b1ba104e6c5a55b442d2f10a8554201a961..05d4cc350a351d994e00ba08f5ce966d0d5c6a0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
> > @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip s5m8767_irq_chip = {
> >  	.ack_base = S5M8767_REG_INT1,
> >  };
> >  
> > -int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
> > +int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic, struct regmap_irq_chip_data **irq_data)
> 
> Instead of passing around pointers to pointers, why not return irq_data
> or NULL?

That was mainly to keep change smaller - I've updated the code as per
your suggestion in v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251120-s5m-alarm-v2-0-cc15f0e32161@linaro.org

Cheers,
Andre'

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-20 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-14 11:47 [PATCH 0/3] Samsung mfd/rtc driver alarm IRQ simplification André Draszik
2025-11-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd: sec: add rtc alarm IRQ as platform device resource André Draszik
2025-11-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] rtc: s5m: query platform device IRQ resource for alarm IRQ André Draszik
2025-11-14 15:58   ` Alexandre Belloni
2025-11-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] mfd: sec: drop now unused struct sec_pmic_dev::irq_data André Draszik
2025-11-20 10:35   ` Lee Jones
2025-11-20 14:38     ` André Draszik [this message]
2025-11-20 10:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] Samsung mfd/rtc driver alarm IRQ simplification Lee Jones
2025-11-20 10:32   ` André Draszik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bf9e08adfa72ff873baca60fc437a2f85f447a1e.camel@linaro.org \
    --to=andre.draszik@linaro.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=jyescas@google.com \
    --cc=kauschluss@disroot.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
    --cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
    --cc=willmcvicker@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®