Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: Ignore ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_ enum values

[Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@engleder-embedded.com>]

On 05.01.23 23:24, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-04 at 21:15 +0100, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
>> Since commit 4104a20646 enum values like
>> ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT are ignored. But there are other enums
>> like ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT, which are not ignored
>> because of the not matching '1000baseT' substring.
>>
>> Add regex to match all ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE enums.
> []
>> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
>> @@ -5783,6 +5783,8 @@ sub process {
>>   			    $var !~ /^(?:[A-Z]+_){1,5}[A-Z]{1,3}[a-z]/ &&
>>   #Ignore Page<foo> variants
>>   			    $var !~ /^(?:Clear|Set|TestClear|TestSet|)Page[A-Z]/ &&
>> +#Ignore ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_<foo> variants
>> +			    $var !~ /^ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_/ &&
>>   #Ignore SI style variants like nS, mV and dB
>>   #(ie: max_uV, regulator_min_uA_show, RANGE_mA_VALUE)
>>   			    $var !~ /^(?:[a-z0-9_]*|[A-Z0-9_]*)?_?[a-z][A-Z](?:_[a-z0-9_]+|_[A-Z0-9_]+)?$/ &&
> 
> These ETHTOOL enums also exist but are caught by the SI style variants test
> 
> ETHTOOL_A_CABLE_PULSE_mV
> ETHTOOL_A_CABLE_AMPLITUDE_mV
> 
> So I guess it's OK.  Thanks.

Did I miss to do something to get this merged? Shall I post it again?

Gerhard