From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262425AbUBRHk0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:40:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263607AbUBRHk0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:40:26 -0500 Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp ([210.143.35.52]:52409 "EHLO TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262425AbUBRHkX (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:40:23 -0500 To: Michael Frank Cc: Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , Giuliano Pochini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH, RFC: 2.6 Documentation/Codingstyle References: <200402130615.10608.mhf@linuxmail.org> <200402131749.19758.mhf@linuxmail.org> <402CA267.4090202@cyberone.com.au> <200402131850.41339.mhf@linuxmail.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop From: Miles Bader Date: 18 Feb 2004 16:39:55 +0900 In-Reply-To: <200402131850.41339.mhf@linuxmail.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michael Frank writes: > 96 is not excessive and will reduce linecount and often makes things > more readable. 96 is excessive. Code that wraps is _really_ unreadable. -Miles -- Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here, beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?