From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261308AbTDHJ22 (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 05:28:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261309AbTDHJ22 (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 05:28:28 -0400 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([210.143.35.51]:39562 "EHLO TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261308AbTDHJ21 (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 05:28:27 -0400 To: Daniel Egger Cc: =?iso-8859-15?q?J=F6rn_Engel?= , Linux Kernel Mailinglist , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New kernel tree for embedded linux References: <20030407171037.GB8178@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20030407194039.GF8178@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1049786306.27774.87.camel@localhost> Reply-To: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop From: Miles Bader Date: 08 Apr 2003 18:36:49 +0900 In-Reply-To: <1049786306.27774.87.camel@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Egger writes: > > How about dealing with uClinux? That's almost entirely embedded > > systems. > > ... without MMU. If you have one you better use it. uClinux runs fine on systems with an MMU (why wouldn't it?). -Miles -- Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen