mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for cpuid leaf 80000021/EAX (FeatureExt2Eax)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:10:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c00b1a65-c885-c874-79cb-16011ac82eb3@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2WIy2A1RuQE/9SK@zn.tnic>

On 11/4/22 4:48 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 04:36:49PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
>> AMD Zen4 processors advertise features in this leaf.
>> Add the leaf and its Automatic IBRS feature bit.
>>
>> Note: New whole leaf (vs a bit) due to propagation via KVM
>> later in this series.
> 
> No, not a separate leaf - use scattered.c
>  > For an example what to do for KVM, see
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103025030.78371-1-jiaxi.chen@linux.intel.com

That adds features that are mutually exclusive between
kvm and the host kernel, unlike AUTOIBRS.

When trying to wire up a scattered host AUTOIBRS version up to
kvm, I couldn't get past all the reverse_cpuid_check()
BUILD_BUGs demanding exclusivity between h/w and "Linux"
(s/w) FEATUREs.

Is there an example of a scattered feature that gets both its
boot_cpu_has() and guest_cpuid_has() satisfied in the same build?

If not, I'll resubmit like this original submission - AUTOIBRS in
a separate h/w leaf.

Thanks,

Kim

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-15 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-04 21:36 [PATCH 0/3] x86/speculation: Support Automatic IBRS Kim Phillips
2022-11-04 21:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for cpuid leaf 80000021/EAX (FeatureExt2Eax) Kim Phillips
2022-11-04 21:48   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-15 23:10     ` Kim Phillips [this message]
2022-11-16 11:59       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-16 20:22         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-16 21:01           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-04 21:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/speculation: Support Automatic IBRS Kim Phillips
2022-11-04 21:52   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-05 11:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-07 22:39       ` Kim Phillips
2022-11-07 23:41         ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-08  8:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-11 12:09         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-11 12:40           ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2022-11-12  0:46             ` Kim Phillips
2022-11-12  0:54               ` Jim Mattson
2022-11-05 11:39     ` David Laight
2022-11-07 22:40       ` Kim Phillips
2022-11-04 21:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/speculation: Support Automatic IBRS under virtualization Kim Phillips
2022-11-04 22:00   ` Jim Mattson
2022-11-07 22:29     ` Kim Phillips
2022-11-07 22:42       ` Jim Mattson
2022-11-08 22:48         ` Kim Phillips
2022-11-08 22:59           ` Jim Mattson
2022-11-06  8:38   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-11-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86/speculation: Support Automatic IBRS Dave Hansen
2022-11-07 22:43   ` Kim Phillips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c00b1a65-c885-c874-79cb-16011ac82eb3@amd.com \
    --to=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®