From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netcube.li (mail.netcube.li [173.249.15.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBE51185955; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 18:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.249.15.149 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735842254; cv=none; b=UpVLEV3Dvzl7K/Cx7cNMIoJfLLb+s3m3JLEmseZCpQzptnxrhizS0or/dparIWzZM9DL5bT8pTfb3+eLTrG+EbTK52EgoSHtLrEVZ+9tngZsJdPgH5zGLQOiyNytF2E9ku0fNNsU9k5LcpmzdJ9uf1x4idnfI/vzclyGQCxUMRk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735842254; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2JmbDnbQNc7V2pvknT5P22OhOlGaZCLcLwRdeBBrIqI=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=HbxKLDvvZjOlZ1v1mFbz3SuxRQreDhm25C+I0hLJUceOqGDI8mI1mPTQHznrTk+MSGt6R3s7zK5fuLbPsht863d/2jeKD4ZH2aZhW692WIbE4WcrfgSlzTxEXBfr898wizHX1etY3GWsBMToboogeAs/LY05Z9kbzDBKta7MCSE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=netcube.li; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netcube.li; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netcube.li header.i=@netcube.li header.b=hhA1uIPX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.249.15.149 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=netcube.li Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netcube.li Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netcube.li header.i=@netcube.li header.b="hhA1uIPX" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=netcube.li; s=s1; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References; bh=8yQkjhBK4YJwWIryxdOEdCXtJYbtQ2mot2TfEcMj8YQ=; b=hhA1uIPXzF1lKgkds3z+fKDgB3qABdkcGbYjmAMEGVn4ONnuTKjaNHjUCFGkApCg1/nqnVgSSg2l4OLzak0oyMSlyVug709QBJB+2mVqrGDz5w+4DRV0xwEQQIne4dRZY672Wi1bNjAohSEVFtKmrl39glYC18ifkQoY5VXJs1o= Received: from webmail.netcube.li (WIN-IJ7TS3MJ5LT [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netcube.li with ESMTPA ; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 19:24:05 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 19:24:04 +0100 From: Lukas Schmid To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Maxime Ripard , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add NetCube Systems Austria name In-Reply-To: <478a6364-0537-453a-881f-c460de2f67a8@kernel.org> References: <32b5c286-9457-4b93-a93f-c8aff356ec10@kernel.org> <20250102175006.3675-1-lukas.schmid@netcube.li> <20250102175006.3675-2-lukas.schmid@netcube.li> <478a6364-0537-453a-881f-c460de2f67a8@kernel.org> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11 Message-ID: X-Sender: lukas.schmid@netcube.li Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 2025-01-02 18:57, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On 02/01/2025 18:49, Lukas Schmid wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Lukas Schmid >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++ > > You did not read really the messages we gave you... > > 1. Read what I wrote in my first reply for v1. I gave detailed > instruction to avoid the exact mistake you now did. > > 2. Read again Andre's reply. > > 3. Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads > (unrelated or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and > might interfere with applying entire sets. > > 4. Next version, with proper cover letter, is after 24h, so you have > some time to digest the feedback. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Hi, Thank you for your feedback, and I sincerely apologize for the mistakes in my submission process. I did read Andre's reply and your feedback on v1, but unfortunately, I had already sent the v2 series as a reply before fully understanding all the recommendations. I realize now that this was a misstep and caused confusion. I will wait until tomorrow, around 20:00, to send the v3 series. I will make sure to include a proper cover letter and ensure that all the feedback from v1 and v2 is addressed. Regarding the v1 feedback, I thought I had incorporated all your suggestions. However, after rereading it, I seem to have missed something critical. Could you please point out what I might have overlooked? I want to make sure I fully understand and correct it in the next iteration. Thank you for your patience and for helping me improve my submission process. Best regards, Lukas Schmid