From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugobjects: Move printk out of db lock critical sections
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:10:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c06a5233-0566-e391-6fc6-4ff6122c265c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cb1526a-e82f-dfa7-4b3c-5ea911a8d476@arista.com>
On 12/12/2018 11:35 PM, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> Hi Waiman,
>
> On 12/12/18 10:28 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>> The db->lock is a raw spinlock and so the lock hold time is supposed
>> to be short. This will not be the case when printk() is being involved
>> in some of the critical sections. In order to avoid the long hold time,
>> in case some messages need to be printed, the debug_object_is_on_stack()
>> and debug_print_object() calls are now moved out of those critical
>> sections.
>>
>> Holding the db->lock while calling printk() may lead to deadlock if
>> printk() somehow requires the allocation/freeing of debug object that
>> happens to be in the same hash bucket or a circular lock dependency
>> warning from lockdep as reported in https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/11/143.
>>
>> [ 87.209665] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
>> [ 87.210547] 4.20.0-rc4-00057-gc96cf92 #1 Tainted: G W
>> [ 87.211449] ------------------------------------------------------
>> [ 87.212405] getty/519 is trying to acquire lock:
>> [ 87.213074] (____ptrval____) (&obj_hash[i].lock){-.-.}, at: debug_check_no_obj_freed+0xb4/0x302
>> [ 87.214343]
>> [ 87.214343] but task is already holding lock:
>> [ 87.215174] (____ptrval____) (&port_lock_key){-.-.}, at: uart_shutdown+0x3a3/0x4e2
>> [ 87.216260]
>> [ 87.216260] which lock already depends on the new lock.
>>
>> This patch was also found to be able to fix a boot hanging problem
>> when the initramfs image was switched on after a debugobjects splat
>> from the EFI code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
>> ---
> I've tried to review it and found minor issues like missed
> debug_object_is_on_stack() for initializing already active object.
>
> But than I come to opinion that it's just generally unsafe:
> debug_obj life-time is protected by bucket's spin_lock.
> Check the conditions when free_object() is being called.
The bucket lock is for protecting the insertion and deletion of
debug_obj to/from the bucket list as well as searching within the bucket
list. It has nothing to do with the life time of the debug_obj itself.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-13 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 22:28 Waiman Long
2018-12-12 23:39 ` Andrew Morton
2018-12-13 22:01 ` Waiman Long
2018-12-13 2:03 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-13 19:59 ` Waiman Long
2018-12-13 2:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-13 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-13 4:35 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-12-13 5:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-13 5:54 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-12-13 9:00 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-13 22:10 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2018-12-14 18:06 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-12-14 18:21 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c06a5233-0566-e391-6fc6-4ff6122c265c@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dima@arista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®