From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264434AbUBII7l (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:59:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264446AbUBII7l (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:59:41 -0500 Received: from news.cistron.nl ([62.216.30.38]:32746 "EHLO ncc1701.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264434AbUBII7k (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:59:40 -0500 From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" Subject: Re: Does anyone still care about BSD ptys? Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 08:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Cistron Group Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: ncc1701.cistron.net 1076317179 13242 62.216.29.200 (9 Feb 2004 08:59:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: miquels@cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article , H. Peter Anvin wrote: >Does anyone still care about old-style BSD ptys, i.e. /dev/pty*? I'm >thinking of restructuring the pty system slightly to make it more >dynamic and to make use of the new larger dev_t, and I'd like to get >rid of the BSD ptys as part of the same patch. bootlogd(8) which is used by Debian and Suse is started as the first thing at boottime. It needs a pty, and tries to use /dev/pts if it's there but falls back to BSD style pty's if /dev/pts isn't mounted - which will be the case 99% of the time. Mike.