From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56986C433E0 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 18:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CEA22B4E for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 18:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728234AbgHJSmy (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:42:54 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35330 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728151AbgHJSmx (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:42:53 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34E6AB55; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 18:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] x86/paravirt: remove 32-bit support from PARAVIRT_XXL To: Boris Ostrovsky , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Deep Shah , "VMware, Inc." , Stefano Stabellini References: <20200807083826.16794-1-jgross@suse.com> <20200807083826.16794-5-jgross@suse.com> <4c5fb964-6acb-6bb8-4eff-0bcb67d922f2@suse.com> <8506b0cd-6f7e-7505-d9b9-e1468cefa4ec@oracle.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBHcm/Dnw==?= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:42:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8506b0cd-6f7e-7505-d9b9-e1468cefa4ec@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10.08.20 18:53, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 8/10/20 12:39 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote: >> On 09.08.20 04:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>> On 8/7/20 4:38 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>> @@ -377,10 +373,7 @@ static inline pte_t __pte(pteval_t val) >>>>   { >>>>       pteval_t ret; >>>>   -    if (sizeof(pteval_t) > sizeof(long)) >>>> -        ret = PVOP_CALLEE2(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val, (u64)val >> >>>> 32); >>>> -    else >>>> -        ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val); >>>> +    ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val); >>>>         return (pte_t) { .pte = ret }; >>> >>> >>> Can this now simply return (pte_t) ret? >> >> I don't think so, but I can turn it into >> >>   return native_make_pte(PVOP_CALLEE1(...)); > > > I thought that since now this is only built for 64-bit we don't have to > worry about different pte_t definitions and can do what we do for > example, for __pgd()? Yes, I did that: return (pte_t) { ret }; Juergen