From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12030C4708D for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235228AbjADTHY (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2023 14:07:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56796 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235077AbjADTHW (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2023 14:07:22 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CBA41B9E4 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 11:07:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1672859241; x=1704395241; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XxNNflySTkyGkLpVJYRC4xsGOhNPakSQIFM+vaB9YCQ=; b=WxyhnPkdMi9a5XIoP9eD8TRfKu7L+ytgVoz+5hHWnC5liWdIE24L+wO6 aIjcDMT0nDHH4geSq1gQUKniZZkiC4eTTMXhLG665HYJops/c7RIHUI5K /ZYBu3pcItHbFnxJC/lDCWhF/qhf8soakOJgwSj+NvkiX5/W0FX6Aavyo hnsqR5OrrlGgHFCdhoTwcyPOwT7ux3N0rTDNs5KErrToOKExpncLsOqUM JIogjo1+1PSjs8FC1QR4cPPjS+PITtF04L0py2hoaG+eTrYFtIc90u4Cs GP9pCmIg9LuSvItZd7M6GxG8Fyvkj50V5BMnlqUnx4XFcwx0Gr5xvgUt8 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10580"; a="386453369" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,300,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="386453369" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jan 2023 11:07:17 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10580"; a="743959675" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,300,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="743959675" Received: from cheungbr-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.209.91.155]) ([10.209.91.155]) by fmsmga003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jan 2023 11:07:15 -0800 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 11:07:15 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCHv13 01/16] x86: Allow atomic MM_CONTEXT flags setting Content-Language: en-US To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra Cc: x86@kernel.org, Kostya Serebryany , Andrey Ryabinin , Andrey Konovalov , Alexander Potapenko , Taras Madan , Dmitry Vyukov , "H . J . Lu" , Andi Kleen , Rick Edgecombe , Bharata B Rao , Jacob Pan , Ashok Raj , Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20221227030829.12508-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20221227030829.12508-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <20221227030829.12508-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/26/22 19:08, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > So far there's no need in atomic setting of MM context flags in > mm_context_t::flags. The flags set early in exec and never change > after that. > > LAM enabling requires atomic flag setting. Could you elaborate on this a little more?