From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F3FC2D0EA for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BC421556 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:31:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586356276; bh=tdUriesX2lwl8y1Yv0Uys2nb8BK6YfXv8InWY36V8uI=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=q0OK8tBVqS+3VBuy+jTWeYj9kYY+nBJVT3eqvTXI437RU9+6L8vWjo8m9uNxD6CLO 6fiGVk2JeioSdOiQDlYoWB5vpfSw5fzu8tlLjaxLxdEAH/eryH/OH+558/N6NTi5gc gvDsL/4+sy+BOBNOLGfF13hOq0eElv0ROPmvLc9M= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728970AbgDHObN (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:31:13 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49122 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728908AbgDHObM (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:31:12 -0400 Received: from tleilax.poochiereds.net (68-20-15-154.lightspeed.rlghnc.sbcglobal.net [68.20.15.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7191F20B1F; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:31:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586356272; bh=tdUriesX2lwl8y1Yv0Uys2nb8BK6YfXv8InWY36V8uI=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tmMzdEbWKbrVqIOCaJYZwfP9Wovaf2rqvxkxUssc4w0XcmFoUuI2BaUfOjZlXPlD2 gGYXo03sfm9rlHanGavJW7T+pVCtGNBQnlkKN7cr5Wih4JsIrn32HmcK0lSHVFMZTD s3cUx73dpmBx4kwyBIgZ4YXTg4DDWGSWn/RQsc0Y= Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ceph: support cross-quota-tree renames From: Jeff Layton To: Luis Henriques , Sage Weil , Ilya Dryomov , Gregory Farnum , Zheng Yan Cc: Frank Schilder , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 10:31:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200407103020.22588-1-lhenriques@suse.com> References: <20200407103020.22588-1-lhenriques@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 11:30 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote: > Hi! > > The following patches will make the cephfs kernel client behave the same > way as the fuse client when doing renames across different quota realms. > > Changes since v1: > > - Dropped 'old == new' check in ceph_quota_check_rename() and added back > optimization in ceph_rename(), to only check realms if old_dir and > new_dir are different. > > Luis Henriques (2): > ceph: normalize 'delta' parameter usage in check_quota_exceeded > ceph: allow rename operation under different quota realms > > fs/ceph/dir.c | 9 +++---- > fs/ceph/quota.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > fs/ceph/super.h | 3 ++- > 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > Looks good. Merged into ceph-client/testing. Thanks! -- Jeff Layton