mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>,
	Pankaj Raghav <pankaj.raghav@linux.dev>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 09/12] fs: Introduce RWF_NOSERIAL flag to indicate parallel reads/writes
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 17:33:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c097ec4d23324ed223fa29bdb43f64d4dabeb3ff.1790596383.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1790596383.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>

Introduce RWF_NOSERIAL flag to indicate that the application is
okay with its reads and writes going in parallel to other read/writes.
This flag will allow writes and read to go in parallel (for eg, under a
shared lock) increasing performance at the cost of losing the (loosely
implemented) POSIX guarantees wrt to R/W serialization that various
filesystems provide.

In this patch we just introduce the flag and in upcoming patches we will
use it to implement parallel writes to increase performance of
RWF_WRITETHROUGH

Co-developed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/fs.h            | 10 +++++++++-
 include/uapi/linux/fs.h       |  6 +++++-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/fs.h |  5 ++++-
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index cbaa65e05d9e..6f84bb41f84a 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ struct readahead_control;
 #define IOCB_DONTCACHE		(__force int) RWF_DONTCACHE
 #define IOCB_NOSIGNAL		(__force int) RWF_NOSIGNAL
 #define IOCB_WRITETHROUGH	(__force int) RWF_WRITETHROUGH
+#define IOCB_NOSERIAL		(__force int) RWF_NOSERIAL
 
 /* non-RWF related bits - start at 16 */
 #define IOCB_EVENTFD		(1 << 16)
@@ -375,7 +376,8 @@ struct readahead_control;
 	{ IOCB_NOIO,		"NOIO" }, \
 	{ IOCB_ALLOC_CACHE,	"ALLOC_CACHE" }, \
 	{ IOCB_AIO_RW,		"AIO_RW" }, \
-	{ IOCB_HAS_METADATA,	"AIO_HAS_METADATA" }
+	{ IOCB_HAS_METADATA,	"AIO_HAS_METADATA" }, \
+	{ IOCB_NOSERIAL,	"IOCB_NOSERIAL" }
 
 struct kiocb {
 	struct file		*ki_filp;
@@ -3499,6 +3501,12 @@ static inline int kiocb_set_rw_flags(struct kiocb *ki, rwf_t flags,
 		ki->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_APPEND;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Currently, only writethrough supports noserial IO.
+	 */
+	if ((flags & RWF_NOSERIAL) && !(flags & RWF_WRITETHROUGH))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	ki->ki_flags |= kiocb_flags;
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
index 67d8987b343d..b2ad2d8548ac 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
@@ -454,10 +454,14 @@ typedef int __bitwise __kernel_rwf_t;
 /* buffered IO that is asynchronously written through to disk after write */
 #define RWF_WRITETHROUGH	((__force __kernel_rwf_t)0x00000200)
 
+/* buffered IO writes that are non sequential because they use a shared lock */
+#define RWF_NOSERIAL	((__force __kernel_rwf_t)0x00000400)
+
 /* mask of flags supported by the kernel */
 #define RWF_SUPPORTED	(RWF_HIPRI | RWF_DSYNC | RWF_SYNC | RWF_NOWAIT |\
 			 RWF_APPEND | RWF_NOAPPEND | RWF_ATOMIC |\
-			 RWF_DONTCACHE | RWF_NOSIGNAL | RWF_WRITETHROUGH)
+			 RWF_DONTCACHE | RWF_NOSIGNAL | RWF_WRITETHROUGH |\
+			 RWF_NOSERIAL)
 
 #define PROCFS_IOCTL_MAGIC 'f'
 
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
index 63ef6b126b8b..c7a1a1d238f0 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
@@ -347,10 +347,13 @@ typedef int __bitwise __kernel_rwf_t;
 /* buffered IO that is asynchronously written through to disk after write */
 #define RWF_WRITETHROUGH	((__force __kernel_rwf_t)0x00000200)
 
+/* buffered IO writes that are non sequential because they use a shared lock */
+#define RWF_NOSERIAL	((__force __kernel_rwf_t)0x00000400)
+
 /* mask of flags supported by the kernel */
 #define RWF_SUPPORTED	(RWF_HIPRI | RWF_DSYNC | RWF_SYNC | RWF_NOWAIT |\
 			 RWF_APPEND | RWF_NOAPPEND | RWF_ATOMIC |\
-			 RWF_DONTCACHE | RWF_WRITETHROUGH)
+			 RWF_DONTCACHE | RWF_WRITETHROUGH | RWF_NOSERIAL)
 
 #define PROCFS_IOCTL_MAGIC 'f'
 
-- 
2.55.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28 12:03 [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] Add RWF_WRITETHROUGH support to iomap & xfs Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-09-28 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/12] xfs: reexpand iter to original count when upgrading to excl ILOCK Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-09-28 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/12] fs: Add counter to track inflight writes that need stable pages Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-09-28 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/12] mm: Refactor folio_clear_dirty_for_io() Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-09-28 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/12] iomap: Add helper to revert iomap iter Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-09-28 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/12] iomap: Add initial support for buffered RWF_WRITETHROUGH Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-09-28 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/12] xfs: Add RWF_WRITETHROUGH support to xfs Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-09-28 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/12] iomap: Add aio support to RWF_WRITETHROUGH Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-09-28 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/12] iomap: Add DSYNC " Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-09-28 12:03 ` Ojaswin Mujoo [this message]
2026-09-28 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/12] xfs: Implement RWF_NOSERIAL to parallelize RWF_WRITETHROUGH writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-09-28 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/12] iomap: Avoid folio dirtying in case of RWF_WRITETHROUGH Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-09-28 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/12] iomap: Handle deadlock due to repeating folios in RWF_WRITETHROUGH Ojaswin Mujoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c097ec4d23324ed223fa29bdb43f64d4dabeb3ff.1790596383.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andres@anarazel.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pankaj.raghav@linux.dev \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®