From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752183AbeCZV34 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:29:56 -0400 Received: from fllnx209.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.16]:24598 "EHLO fllnx209.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751730AbeCZV3v (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:29:51 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] remoteproc: da8xx: use the reset framework To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Sekhar Nori , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , David Lechner , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Philipp Zabel CC: , , , , , Bartosz Golaszewski References: <20180323130455.11470-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180323130455.11470-8-brgl@bgdev.pl> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:28:41 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180323130455.11470-8-brgl@bgdev.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bart, On 03/23/2018 08:04 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines > we used so far. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- > drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c > index f134192922e0..3689473f8b49 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -20,8 +21,6 @@ > #include > #include > > -#include /* for davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() */ > - > #include "remoteproc_internal.h" > > static char *da8xx_fw_name; > @@ -72,6 +71,7 @@ struct da8xx_rproc { > struct da8xx_rproc_mem *mem; > int num_mems; > struct clk *dsp_clk; > + struct reset_control *dsp_reset; > void (*ack_fxn)(struct irq_data *data); > struct irq_data *irq_data; > void __iomem *chipsig; > @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) > struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; > struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = (struct da8xx_rproc *)rproc->priv; > struct clk *dsp_clk = drproc->dsp_clk; > + struct reset_control *dsp_reset = drproc->dsp_reset; > int ret; > > /* hw requires the start (boot) address be on 1KB boundary */ > @@ -155,7 +156,11 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) > return ret; > } > > - davinci_clk_reset_deassert(dsp_clk); > + ret = reset_control_deassert(dsp_reset); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "reset_control_deassert() failed: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; need to unwind the clk_prepare_enable() here. > + } > > return 0; > } > @@ -163,8 +168,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) > static int da8xx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > { > struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = rproc->priv; > + int ret; > + > + ret = reset_control_assert(drproc->dsp_reset); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(rproc->dev.parent, > + "reset_control_assert() failed: %d\n", ret); prefer the trace statement to be on the same line as dev_err, you can just keep the ret on the next line. I am fine with defining a local dev variable as well (mirrors da8xx_rproc_start() to have the trace in a single line). > + return ret; > + } > > - davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk); > clk_disable_unprepare(drproc->dsp_clk); > > return 0; > @@ -232,6 +244,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct resource *bootreg_res; > struct resource *chipsig_res; > struct clk *dsp_clk; > + struct reset_control *dsp_reset; > void __iomem *chipsig; > void __iomem *bootreg; > int irq; > @@ -268,6 +281,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(dsp_clk); > } > > + dsp_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(dsp_reset)) { > + if (PTR_ERR(dsp_reset) != -EPROBE_DEFER) > + dev_err(dev, "unable to get reset control: %ld\n", > + PTR_ERR(dsp_reset)); > + > + return PTR_ERR(dsp_reset); > + } > + > if (dev->of_node) { > ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev); > if (ret) { > @@ -309,7 +331,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > * *not* in reset, but da8xx_rproc_start() needs the DSP to be > * held in reset at the time it is called. > */ > - ret = davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk); > + ret = reset_control_assert(dsp_reset); > if (ret) > goto free_rproc; > The reset API usage changes themselves look good otherwise. regards Suman