From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A72FC46471 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 06:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366E1218C3 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 06:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="HgLB53hl" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 366E1218C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387644AbeHGIQV (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2018 04:16:21 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:35354 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728263AbeHGIQV (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2018 04:16:21 -0400 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w7762IgA044068; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 01:02:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1533621738; bh=YL/ZQmphpD0iTyyf24TF2tz2ZqtHusEN0haDa++zFp8=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=HgLB53hlHNCzVQj0puVVTi5XqDgFvw78gz+56N08OfBr/QfWwJ6OM83FUDwoMFdtX hDVAMpcpmJ7gxT6SoqIC21RjPhT4Y5n5tX4ppY/U7sG1ggXfhX4/YCzhy1ThHa/Jpd 2C1mcXObbSDJovncpA9TR7NhYZt9PaOJLQ63OhCA= Received: from DLEE103.ent.ti.com (dlee103.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.33]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w7762I0g024593; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 01:02:18 -0500 Received: from DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) by DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 01:02:17 -0500 Received: from dflp33.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.16) by DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 01:02:17 -0500 Received: from [172.24.190.172] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w7762ErA020402; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 01:02:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] ARM: davinci: remove duplicate aemif support To: David Lechner , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd CC: Bartosz Golaszewski , Kevin Hilman , Russell King , , , , Bartosz Golaszewski References: <20180628095748.4462-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <52a274f1-283a-a14a-54f3-4b95b6605c4f@ti.com> <59fdc532-bb72-ffae-cfb6-a7f156c14771@lechnology.com> <125d73f7-7311-866f-1e9d-d3c1f9473899@lechnology.com> <92e41afc-cf3a-e713-11d5-247b8d6e3a64@ti.com> <4154b955-4f89-035a-8a02-a3e8bd8d9ede@lechnology.com> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:32:13 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4154b955-4f89-035a-8a02-a3e8bd8d9ede@lechnology.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, On Monday 06 August 2018 10:05 PM, David Lechner wrote: > On 07/10/2018 05:19 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Friday 06 July 2018 11:09 PM, David Lechner wrote: >>> On 07/04/2018 01:35 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>>> Hi David, >>>> >>>> On Monday 02 July 2018 09:02 PM, David Lechner wrote: >>>>> On 07/02/2018 07:28 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>>>>> Hi David, Stephen, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday 28 June 2018 03:27 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>>>>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This series moves all aemif/nand users to using the ti-aemif >>>>>>> platform >>>>>>> driver located in drivers/memory instead of the older API located in >>>>>>> mach-davinci. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> First five patches add necessary changes to the clock driver. Next >>>>>>> seven convert the board files to using the ti-aemif driver. Last >>>>>>> patch >>>>>>> removes now dead code. >>>>>> >>>>>> How do you want to handle this series? I can apply the series and >>>>>> provide you an immutable branch on v4.18-rc1 with the clock patches >>>>>> applied if that can work. >>>>> >>>>> Sounds good to me. But I'm new to this maintainer thing, so maybe >>>>> there is something to consider that I haven't thought of? >>>> >>>> I don't think there is more to it. Ultimately there should not be two >>>> commits for the same patch. Either you can apply and share the >>>> commit to >>>> use or I can do that as well. I am equally fine either way. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Sekhar >>>> >>> >>> I've created a branch for-sekhar at https://github.com/dlech/linux.git >>> with the clk commits. >> >> Thanks. I merged commit f917ff75ac55b6d829c9d1142e83913064565d5b (top of >> that branch) to my v4.19/soc branch. Please do let Stephen and Mike know >> about this then when you send your stuff for v4.19. >> > > Since there have been no more clk-davinci patches for v4.19, I assume that > it is OK to just let this go through the ARM tree via Sekhar? Yes, that should be fine. Thanks, Sekhar