From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>,
cel@kernel.org, neil@brown.name, okorniev@redhat.com,
Dai.Ngo@oracle.com, tom@talpey.com
Cc: bfields@fieldses.org, skinsbursky@parallels.com,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+561b859d032c8bf2fb53@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: fix out-of-bounds read of sv_permsocks when starting a thread
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 08:04:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c19a047cc3abde3ee342cf4188620e70ab51b429.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261018113312.10455-1-kartikey406@gmail.com>
On Sun, 2026-10-18 at 17:03 +0530, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> nfsd() derives its struct net from the first entry of
> serv->sv_permsocks using list_entry() without checking that the list
> is non-empty. If the list is empty, list_entry() returns a bogus
> svc_xprt computed from the list head embedded in struct svc_serv, and
> the following perm_sock->xpt_net load reads far past the end of the
> svc_serv allocation:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nfsd+0x118/0xbc0 fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c:894
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff88802d423f50 by task nfsd/5988
>
> The list can be empty because nothing guarantees that a permanent
> listener exists while a thread starts. With dynamic thread spawning, a
> thread can begin running after the last listener has been closed and
> removed.
>
> Take sv_lock, which protects sv_permsocks, and check for an empty list
> and read xpt_net in the same critical section. If there is no
> permanent socket, report -ENOTCONN through svc_thread_init_status(),
> which wakes the creator and exits the thread, instead of dereferencing
> a bogus pointer.
>
> Fixes: 88c476661719 ("nfsd: pass proper net to nfsd_destroy() from NFSd kthreads")
> Reported-by: syzbot+561b859d032c8bf2fb53@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=561b859d032c8bf2fb53
> Tested-by: syzbot+561b859d032c8bf2fb53@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> index 2edf716ea022..da6fce79efae 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> @@ -890,17 +890,31 @@ nfsd(void *vrqstp)
> {
> struct svc_rqst *rqstp = (struct svc_rqst *) vrqstp;
> struct svc_pool *pool = rqstp->rq_pool;
> - struct svc_xprt *perm_sock = list_entry(rqstp->rq_server->sv_permsocks.next, typeof(struct svc_xprt), xpt_list);
> - struct net *net = perm_sock->xpt_net;
> - struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
> + struct svc_serv *serv = rqstp->rq_server;
> + struct svc_xprt *perm_sock;
> + struct net *net = NULL;
> + struct nfsd_net *nn = NULL;
> struct nfsd_thread_local_info ntli = { };
> bool have_mutex = false;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
> + if (list_empty(&serv->sv_permsocks)) {
> + err = -ENOTCONN;
> + } else {
> + perm_sock = list_first_entry(&serv->sv_permsocks,
> + struct svc_xprt, xpt_list);
> + net = perm_sock->xpt_net;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
>
>
There is another way to get to the nfsd_net here. It turns out that the
sv_stats field for nfsd always points to the one embedded in nfsd_net,
so we could avoid the socket lists altogether by just doing something
like:
struct nfsd_net *nn = container_of(rqstp->rq_server->sv_stats,
struct nfsd_net, nfsd_svcstats);
That avoids the extra locking, but it seems a little weird to depend on
the sv_stats field. Maybe we could wrap that in a little helper or
something to make it less ugly?
An alternative would be to add a serv->sv_net field, but most services
are not per-net. nfsd is the exception so it's the only one that would
use it.
>
> + if (!err)
> + nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
> /* At this point, the thread shares current->fs
> * with the init process. We need to create files with the
> * umask as defined by the client instead of init's umask.
> */
> - svc_thread_init_status(rqstp, unshare_fs_struct());
> + svc_thread_init_status(rqstp, err ?: unshare_fs_struct());
>
> current->fs->umask = 0;
>
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-18 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-18 11:33 Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-10-18 12:04 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-10-18 20:45 ` NeilBrown
2026-10-19 0:40 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c19a047cc3abde3ee342cf4188620e70ab51b429.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=kartikey406@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=syzbot+561b859d032c8bf2fb53@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®