From: "Liu,Qi(ACU-T1)" <liuqi16@baidu.com>
To: 'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@infradead.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Yongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Xie,Yongji" <xieyongji@baidu.com>,
"Zhang,Yu(ACU-T1)" <zhangyu31@baidu.com>,
"Yuan,Linsi" <yuanlinsi01@baidu.com>, "Ni,Xun" <nixun@baidu.com>,
"Li,Lin(ACU-T1)" <lilin24@baidu.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: 答复: [RFC] locking/rwsem: Avoid issuing wakeup before setting the reader waiter to nil
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:34:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1c9d6b30d7745ea9ac5b752f9a506c3@baidu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181129220544.GE11632@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Is there a semantic divergence between x86 instruction "LOCK cmpxchg" and the macro cmpxchg defined in linux kernel? The former guarantee full barrier in any case, and the latter only imply barrier in case of success?
So, we use
smp_mb__before_atomic()
cmpxchg_relaxed() // no barrier
to get rid of the redundant barrier
smp_mb__before_atomic()
cmpxchg() // imply a redundant barrier when successing
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:peterz@infradead.org]
发送时间: 2018年11月30日 6:06
收件人: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
抄送: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>; Yongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com>; mingo@redhat.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Xie,Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com>; Zhang,Yu(ACU-T1) <zhangyu31@baidu.com>; Liu,Qi(ACU-T1) <liuqi16@baidu.com>; Yuan,Linsi <yuanlinsi01@baidu.com>; Ni,Xun <nixun@baidu.com>; Li,Lin(ACU-T1) <lilin24@baidu.com>; Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
主题: Re: [RFC] locking/rwsem: Avoid issuing wakeup before setting the reader waiter to nil
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 01:34:05PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> That will certainly work for x86. However, I am not sure if that will
> be optimal for arm and powerpc.
smp_mb__before_atomic()
cmpxchg_relaxed()
works. Also see pv_kick_node()'s commit:
34d54f3d6917 ("locking/pvqspinlock: Relax cmpxchg's to improve performance on some architectures")
you might know the author of that :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-30 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-29 12:50 Yongji Xie
2018-11-29 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 14:02 ` Yongji Xie
2018-11-29 18:43 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-29 18:49 ` Waiman Long
2018-11-29 15:21 ` Waiman Long
2018-11-29 15:29 ` Waiman Long
2018-11-29 16:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 17:02 ` Waiman Long
2018-11-29 17:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 17:58 ` Waiman Long
2018-11-29 18:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 18:17 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-29 18:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 18:26 ` Waiman Long
2018-11-29 18:31 ` Will Deacon
2018-11-29 18:34 ` Waiman Long
2018-11-29 22:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-30 9:34 ` Liu,Qi(ACU-T1) [this message]
2018-11-30 14:15 ` 答复: " Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 21:30 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-29 21:34 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-29 22:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-30 9:30 ` Andrea Parri
2018-12-03 5:31 ` [PATCH -tip] kernel/sched,wake_q: Branch predict wake_q_add() cmpxchg Davidlohr Bueso
2018-12-03 16:10 ` Waiman Long
2019-01-21 11:28 ` [tip:locking/core] sched/wake_q: Add branch prediction hint to " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2018-12-10 15:12 ` [RFC] locking/rwsem: Avoid issuing wakeup before setting the reader waiter to nil Yongji Xie
2018-12-17 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-17 13:12 ` Yongji Xie
2019-01-07 14:35 ` Waiman Long
2019-01-07 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-07 15:35 ` Waiman Long
2018-12-17 20:53 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-12-18 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-18 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-18 17:27 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-12-18 18:54 ` [PATCH v2] sched/wake_q: Reduce reference counting for special users Davidlohr Bueso
2018-12-18 19:17 ` Waiman Long
2018-12-18 19:30 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-12-18 19:39 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-12-18 19:53 ` [PATCH v4] " Davidlohr Bueso
2018-12-18 20:35 ` Waiman Long
2019-01-21 16:02 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-01-22 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-04 8:57 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2019-02-07 19:30 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-02-12 14:14 ` Daniel Vacek
2019-01-21 11:28 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/rwsem: Fix (possible) missed wakeup tip-bot for Xie Yongji
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c1c9d6b30d7745ea9ac5b752f9a506c3@baidu.com \
--to=liuqi16@baidu.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=elohimes@gmail.com \
--cc=lilin24@baidu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nixun@baidu.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xieyongji@baidu.com \
--cc=yuanlinsi01@baidu.com \
--cc=zhangyu31@baidu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®