From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B3CC7EE2F for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 15:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241554AbjFGP5X (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:57:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59116 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240958AbjFGP5M (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:57:12 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3C571BEA; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 08:57:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1686153431; x=1717689431; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4WSpnJiCcc25uako5vnysuv35mXObG2rTQvLgVdCHmc=; b=Wsc8cfUffaC+8gbkuNyME9z/7kPxfrbkiMuo8kaomjh5iBwZi/u9Xtkk QpDWcerSd+sEFFZvdJrIJhPdcjowETaGbJhK7ifnAUEGEQEuW9oIg3jbK u74blBWqmEVXyakqHObOrZ6yDmyRSyZD8ZZVUidabjsjtOsukfxj5GoAn JH2vBB8lwsag7woxWxK61bABCe/LEEvasIjlYbbiu8odnxoQ3aZ5Buy7b P/cIfb8s7DNYKjRGquea/vIRHE5t/4XKgYgwK2QIdDr0MBeBRGncRGZXQ KMqKRSBtpE30Xtk9dYh222BfSToyV0Lu42YwOzElyVo5ZH/uay6XffcRB A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10734"; a="360360133" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,224,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="360360133" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jun 2023 08:57:10 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10734"; a="739335890" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,224,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="739335890" Received: from vsmyers-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.146.233]) ([10.212.146.233]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jun 2023 08:57:09 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 08:57:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/20] x86/virt/tdx: Add placeholder to construct TDMRs to cover all TDX memory regions Content-Language: en-US To: Kai Huang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com, chao.gao@intel.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, bagasdotme@gmail.com, sagis@google.com, imammedo@redhat.com References: From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/4/23 07:27, Kai Huang wrote: > +struct tdmr_info_list { > + void *tdmrs; /* Flexible array to hold 'tdmr_info's */ > + int nr_consumed_tdmrs; /* How many 'tdmr_info's are in use */ I'm looking back here after seeing the weird cast in the next patch. Why is this a void* instead of a _real_ type?