From: Fiona Klute <fiona.klute@gmx.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Thangaraj Samynathan <Thangaraj.S@microchip.com>,
Rengarajan Sundararajan <Rengarajan.S@microchip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-list@raspberrypi.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: usb: lan78xx: Enforce a minimum interrupt polling period
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:31:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c20b01c9-0412-482d-b82e-c1bf1c7ef4ef@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0901d90d-3f20-4a10-b680-9c978e04ddda@lunn.ch>
Am 10.04.25 um 16:43 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
>>> Ah, O.K. This tells me the PHY is a lan88xx. And there is a workaround
>>> involved for an issue in this PHY. Often PHYs are driven by polling
>>> for status changes once per second. Not all PHYs/boards support
>>> interrupts. It could be this workaround has only been tested with
>>> polling, not interrupts, and so is broken when interrupts are used.
>>>
>>> As a quick hack test, in lan78xx_phy_init()
>>>
>>> /* if phyirq is not set, use polling mode in phylib */
>>> if (dev->domain_data.phyirq > 0)
>>> phydev->irq = dev->domain_data.phyirq;
>>> else
>>> phydev->irq = PHY_POLL;
>>>
>>> Hard code phydev->irq to PHY_POLL, so interrupts are not used.
>>>
>>> See if you can reproduce the issue when interrupts are not used.
>> It took a while, but I'm fairly confident now that the workaround works,
>> I've had over 1000 boots on the hardware in question and didn't see the
>> bug. Someone going by upsampled reported the same in the issue on Github
>> [1], and pointed out that people working with some Nvidia board and a
>> LAN7800 USB device came to the same conclusion a while ago [2].
>>
>> That leaves me with the question, what does that mean going forward?
>> Would it make sense to add a quirk to unconditionally force polling on
>> lan88xx, at least until/unless the interrupt handling can be fixed?
>
> I don't think you need a quirk:
>
> static struct phy_driver microchip_phy_driver[] = {
> {
> .phy_id = 0x0007c132,
> /* This mask (0xfffffff2) is to differentiate from
> * LAN8742 (phy_id 0x0007c130 and 0x0007c131)
> * and allows future phy_id revisions.
> */
> .phy_id_mask = 0xfffffff2,
> .name = "Microchip LAN88xx",
>
> /* PHY_GBIT_FEATURES */
>
> .probe = lan88xx_probe,
> .remove = lan88xx_remove,
>
> .config_init = lan88xx_config_init,
> .config_aneg = lan88xx_config_aneg,
> .link_change_notify = lan88xx_link_change_notify,
>
> .config_intr = lan88xx_phy_config_intr,
> .handle_interrupt = lan88xx_handle_interrupt,
>
> Just remove .config_intr and .handle_interrupt. If these are not
> provided, phylib will poll, even if an interrupt number has been
> passed. And since these functions are not shared with any other PHY,
> you can remove them.
>
> Please write a good commit message, we want it clear why they where
> removed, to try to prevent somebody putting them back again.
>
> And please aim this for net, not net-next:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>
> The change will then get back ported to stable kernels.
I just sent the new patch, I hope I got that right, thank you! Test got
to about 650 successful boots by now. :-)
Best regards,
Fiona
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-14 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 16:59 Fiona Klute
2025-03-10 18:06 ` Alan Stern
2025-03-11 12:37 ` Fiona Klute
2025-03-10 21:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-03-11 12:30 ` Fiona Klute
2025-03-11 13:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-03-11 14:36 ` Fiona Klute
2025-04-10 14:14 ` Fiona Klute
2025-04-10 14:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-14 15:31 ` Fiona Klute [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c20b01c9-0412-482d-b82e-c1bf1c7ef4ef@gmx.de \
--to=fiona.klute@gmx.de \
--cc=Rengarajan.S@microchip.com \
--cc=Thangaraj.S@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel-list@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®