Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix the NMI IDT-vectoring info handling

[Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>]

On 2016-09-22 11:45, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2016-09-22 17:37 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>:
>>
>>
>> On 22/09/2016 05:34, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>> -     if (vmx->rmode.vm86_active) {
>>> -             if (kvm_inject_realmode_interrupt(vcpu, NMI_VECTOR, 0) != EMULATE_DONE)
>>> -                     kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, vcpu);
>>> -             return;
>>> +             ++vcpu->stat.nmi_injections;
>>> +             vmx->nmi_known_unmasked = false;
>>> +             if (vmx->rmode.vm86_active) {
>>> +                     if (kvm_inject_realmode_interrupt(vcpu, NMI_VECTOR, 0) != EMULATE_DONE)
>>> +                             kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, vcpu);
>>> +                     return;
>>> +             }
>>>       }
>>>       vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_INTR_INFO_FIELD,
>>>                       INTR_TYPE_NMI_INTR | INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK | NMI_VECTOR);
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the patch is mostly okay but the "if (vmx->rmode.vm86_active)" part
>> should be done also if the VCPU is in guest mode.  See
>> vmx_queue_exception for a similar example.
> 
> Thanks for pointing out. :)
> 
>>
>> I would like to know which processors lack virtual NMI support.  I'd
>> rather rip that code out...
> 
> At least the Sandy Bridge server on my hand supports Virtual NMIs, I
> don't have machine older than this.

IIRC, my last-but-one notebook was lacking vNMI, and that was a Core 2
Duo. Maybe there are embedded product out there relying on this
emulation, but I don't have any evidence.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux