From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
To: Wei-Jie Hung <imbigking12@gmail.com>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Xiaofeng Yuan <xiaofengmian@163.com>, Klara Modin <klara@kasm.eu>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: patch: fix handling of bpf-jit execmem addresses
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:20:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c28917c2-4715-4c70-a2d3-582ca641e1d6@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914115607.350097-1-imbigking12@gmail.com>
On 2026/9/14 19:56, Wei-Jie Hung wrote:
> Commit 8718e5a3090b ("riscv: patch: skip fixmap mapping when kernel text
> is already writable") gated the core_kernel_text() branch of patch_map()
> on CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX, and explicitly left the vmalloc branch
> unchanged. That branch has a separate problem.
>
> That branch only creates a temporary writable fixmap alias when
> CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX is enabled, and otherwise assumes the target is
> directly writable and returns the address unchanged. That assumption no
> longer holds: bpf_prog_pack_alloc calls set_memory_rox() on every pack
> unconditionally in alloc_new_pack(), independently of any
> CONFIG_STRICT_*_RWX option, so BPF text in the vmalloc area is read-only
> regardless of what CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX says.
>
> With CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX=n, patch_map() returns the read-only
> address directly, the subsequent copy_to_kernel_nofault() takes a
> page fault and returns -EFAULT. bpf_arch_text_copy() turns that into
> -EINVAL, which propagates through bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() to the
> WARN_ON() in bpf_int_jit_compile() and leaves the program un-JITed.
>
> Note that BPF cannot be fixed the way kprobes was in
> commit bdc46e507b59 ("riscv: mm: make EXECMEM_KPROBES writable without
> CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX"). EXECMEM_BPF is already PAGE_KERNEL, i.e.
> writable at allocation time; the read-only mapping is established
> afterwards by generic code in alloc_new_pack(), which arch code cannot
> influence. The only place this can be handled is patch_map().
>
> This is the same problem that was fixed on arm64 by commit b1480ed230ac
> ("arm64: patching: fix handling of execmem addresses"), and the fix is
> the same: CONFIG_EXECMEM is what actually tracks whether the vmalloc
> area can hold executable memory that needs a temporary alias to be
> written. CONFIG_BPF_JIT, CONFIG_KPROBES and CONFIG_MODULES all select
> it.
>
> Note that this is not limited to CONFIG_MODULES=n. Unlike arm64, riscv
> selects CONFIG_ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX, so CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX can
> be disabled with CONFIG_MODULES=y as well, and the bug is reachable in
> that configuration too.
>
> The !CONFIG_MMU build is unaffected: it has its own __patch_insn_set()
> and __patch_insn_write() implementations and never calls patch_map().
>
> Fixes: 2c9e5d4a0082 ("bpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_JIT dependency on CONFIG_MODULES of")
> Signed-off-by: Wei-Jie Hung <imbigking12@gmail.com>
> ---
> Based on riscv/fixes (b94cec5761d2).
>
> Reproduced on qemu-system-riscv64 -M virt with CONFIG_BPF_JIT=y,
> CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y and CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX=n.
> ptp_classifier_init() builds a cBPF filter from sock_init(),
> so the failure happens during boot without any userspace involved:
>
> WARNING: arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c:156 at bpf_int_jit_compile+0x3dc/0x43e
> Call Trace:
> bpf_int_jit_compile+0x3dc/0x43e
> __bpf_prog_select_runtime+0xec/0x186
> bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x12/0x1a
> bpf_prepare_filter+0x368/0x46a
> bpf_prog_create+0x66/0x90
> ptp_classifier_init+0x3e/0x60
> sock_init+0xc4/0xe6
> do_one_initcall+0x78/0x14a
>
> kernel BUG at net/core/ptp_classifier.c:227!
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>
> The BUG_ON() is reached because CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y turns the
> silent interpreter fallback into -ENOTSUPP. With
> CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=n the failure is silent: writing 1 to
> /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable and loading any program reproduces the
> same warning, but the program simply falls back to the interpreter and
> the kernel keeps running.
>
> Tested with CONFIG_BPF_JIT=y:
> - CONFIG_MODULES=n, CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y:
> panics before this patch, boots after
> - CONFIG_MODULES=y, CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX=n,
> CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y: same panic before this patch, boots after
> - CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=n: the warning above is emitted when a
> program is loaded from userspace before this patch, and gone after
> - riscv defconfig (CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX=y): unaffected, boots
> before and after
> - kprobes (kretprobe on __riscv_sys_openat via kprobe_events):
> works before and after this patch
>
> arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
> index 2239c28981bc..2b5adf01c550 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static __always_inline void *patch_map(void *addr, const unsigned int fixmap)
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX))
> return addr;
> phys = __pa_symbol(addr);
> - } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX)) {
> + } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXECMEM)) {
> struct page *page = vmalloc_to_page(addr);
>
> BUG_ON(!page);
Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 11:56 Wei-Jie Hung
2026-09-18 1:20 ` Pu Lehui [this message]
2026-09-24 21:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-01 6:14 ` Roger洪偉捷
2026-10-04 22:52 ` Paul Walmsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c28917c2-4715-4c70-a2d3-582ca641e1d6@huawei.com \
--to=pulehui@huawei.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imbigking12@gmail.com \
--cc=klara@kasm.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaofengmian@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®