From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757875AbcHCLA1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:00:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:34621 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752414AbcHCLAY (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:00:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM changes for 4.8 merge window To: Michael Ellerman , torvalds@linux-foundation.org References: <1470141468-120437-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <87vazilepe.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <12aabe49-09c5-35db-e15c-bf2b75bd3f67@redhat.com> <87d1lql58t.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger , Christoffer Dall , Dan Williams , Marc Zyngier , Paul Mackerras From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:00:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87d1lql58t.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/08/2016 08:46, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Considering the h in "hmi" is for hypervisor, > > Well hypervisor != KVM. > > Though in this case hmi.c was pretty safe because it was new code. But > if I'd received a powerpc patch to hmi.c I wouldn't have thought to > check if it conflicted with the KVM tree. This, together with the fact that hmi.c does nothing if KVM is inactive, suggests to me that hmi.c should be in arch/powerpc/kvm. I'll send a patch soo; I don't care who merges it, but a topic branch would be appropriate. ;) Paolo