mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
To: linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: hwbm: if CONFIG_NET_HWBM unset, make stub functions static
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:23:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2ba06f1-fabd-1edb-b75f-8f6e2c23c0ce@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191022151818.21383-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>

On 22/10/2019 16:18, Ben Dooks (Codethink) wrote:
> If CONFIG_NET_HWBM is not set, then these stub functions in
> <net/hwbm.h> should be declared static to avoid trying to
> export them from any driver that includes this.
> 
> Note, add __maybe_unused as the marvell mvneta.c driver will
> otherwise cause gcc warnings from these.

urgh, static inline was what I was actually searching for here.

> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
> 
> ./include/net/hwbm.h:24:6: warning: symbol 'hwbm_buf_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
> ./include/net/hwbm.h:25:5: warning: symbol 'hwbm_pool_refill' was not declared. Should it be static?
> ./include/net/hwbm.h:26:5: warning: symbol 'hwbm_pool_add' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks (Codethink) <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
> ---
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>   include/net/hwbm.h | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/hwbm.h b/include/net/hwbm.h
> index 81643cf8a1c4..cb5e6de8b7cd 100644
> --- a/include/net/hwbm.h
> +++ b/include/net/hwbm.h
> @@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ void hwbm_buf_free(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, void *buf);
>   int hwbm_pool_refill(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, gfp_t gfp);
>   int hwbm_pool_add(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, unsigned int buf_num);
>   #else
> -void hwbm_buf_free(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, void *buf) {}
> -int hwbm_pool_refill(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, gfp_t gfp) { return 0; }
> -int hwbm_pool_add(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, unsigned int buf_num)
> +static void __maybe_unused hwbm_buf_free(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, void *buf) {}
> +static int __maybe_unused hwbm_pool_refill(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, gfp_t gfp) { return 0; }
> +static int __maybe_unused hwbm_pool_add(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, unsigned int buf_num)
>   { return 0; }
>   #endif /* CONFIG_HWBM */
>   #endif /* _HWBM_H */
> 


-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius

https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html

      reply	other threads:[~2019-10-22 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-22 15:18 Ben Dooks (Codethink)
2019-10-22 15:23 ` Ben Dooks [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c2ba06f1-fabd-1edb-b75f-8f6e2c23c0ce@codethink.co.uk \
    --to=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®