From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854A5C4727C for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 06:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404DF21481 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 06:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="AfHKGOGv" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731106AbgJAGmC (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 02:42:02 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:54906 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725878AbgJAGmB (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 02:42:01 -0400 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0916fvGe112995; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 01:41:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1601534517; bh=WAQBSDfsouAtHKLExKivcljiQxBv5HXEbRiRoGIS/Cw=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=AfHKGOGv7buJ3sRUXOdvyiBGF3Q8wq6WeGkgzSrk+x0OqBdXc0/QSKRvlYL+LCnig cC42BDKKacVtiPHhARtZlHXVeqdyLZNavPhU3/GuO+y/wtOHFo96K5+GJs49s0O4wc RgUTfhdFaQjBnB88n0rwf1/fVyZtL8Xe4bpzXlYw= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0916fvNL040434; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 01:41:57 -0500 Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 01:41:57 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 01:41:57 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.6] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0916fspd008476; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 01:41:55 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] soc: ti: k3-socinfo: Add entry for AM64 SoC family To: Grygorii Strashko , , , , , "Nori, Sekhar" CC: , , Vignesh Raghavendra , "Anna, Suman" References: <20200928083429.17390-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20200928083429.17390-12-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> From: Peter Ujfalusi X-Pep-Version: 2.0 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:42:11 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Grygorii, On 30/09/2020 16.56, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 28/09/2020 11:34, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> It's JTAG PARTNO is 0xBB38. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi >> --- >> =C2=A0 drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c | 1 + >> =C2=A0 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c= >> index bbbc2d2b7091..a14ec68846dd 100644 >> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c >> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c >> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static const struct k3_soc_id { >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 { 0xBB5A, "AM65X" }, >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 { 0xBB64, "J721E" }, >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 { 0xBB6D, "J7200" }, >> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 { 0xBB38, "AM64" } >=20 > Shouldn't it be AM64X Good point, I'll fix this up and then the DMA series. While here, what do you think: should we keep the DMA compatibles as I have them in v1 (am64-dmss-bcdma and am64-dmss-pktdma): https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-10-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com= / https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-11-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com= / or change them to am64x-dmss-* ? I'll ask Rob on the binding doc patches as well. >=20 >> =C2=A0 }; >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 static int >> >=20 - P=C3=A9ter Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki