From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753222AbdF2Nkb (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:40:31 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:45778 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752970AbdF2NkR (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:40:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon: Add LTC2471/LTC2473 driver To: Lars-Peter Clausen , Mike Looijmans , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdelvare@suse.com, "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , Jonathan Cameron References: <1498733135-4729-1-git-send-email-mike.looijmans@topic.nl> <1498738434-18252-1-git-send-email-mike.looijmans@topic.nl> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 06:40:14 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/29/2017 05:30 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 06/29/2017 02:13 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: >> The LTC2741 and LTC2473 are single voltage monitoring chips. The LTC2473 >> is similar to the LTC2471 but outputs a signed differential value. >> >> Datasheet: >> http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/datasheet/24713fb.pdf > > This looks more like a general purpose ADC rather than a specialized voltage > monitoring chip. In my opinion this driver would be better suited for the > IIO framework. But before you start working on that lets try to hear what > others think about this. > Agreed (I just replied to that on another thread). Guenter