Re: [PATCH 5/8] drivers: media: coda: fix warning same module names

[Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@thinci.com>]

On 10/06/2019 14:03, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 12:13, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/6/19 11:47 AM, Anders Roxell wrote:
>>> When building with CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA and CONFIG_CODA_FS enabled as
>>> loadable modules, we see the following warning:
>>>
>>> warning: same module names found:
>>>    fs/coda/coda.ko
>>>    drivers/media/platform/coda/coda.ko
>>>
>>> Rework so media coda matches the config fragment. Leaving CODA_FS as is
>>> since thats a well known module.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile | 4 ++--
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile
>>> index 54e9a73a92ab..588e6bf7c190 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>>   # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>>
>>> -coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o
>>> +video-coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o
>>>
>>> -obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += coda.o
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += video-coda.o
>>
>> How about imx-coda? video-coda suggests it is part of the video subsystem,
>> which it isn't.
> 
> I'll resend a v2 shortly with imx-coda instead.

What about other vendor SoCs implementing the Coda IP block which are 
not an imx? I'd prefer a more generic name - maybe media-coda.

Thanks,
Matt

> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Anders
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>          Hans
>>
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_VDOA) += imx-vdoa.o
>>>
>>