Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] usb: xhci: Load Raspberry Pi 4 VL805's firmware

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On 6/1/20 1:09 PM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 12:53 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 6/1/20 12:47 PM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 18:26 +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
>>>> Newer revisions of the RPi4 need their xHCI chip, VL805, firmware to be
>>>> loaded explicitly. Earlier versions didn't need that as they where using
>>>> an EEPROM for that purpose. This series takes care of setting up the
>>>> relevant infrastructure and run the firmware loading routine at the
>>>> right moment.
>>>>
>>>> Note that this builds on top of Sylwester Nawrocki's "USB host support
>>>> for Raspberry Pi 4 board" series.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Please don't forget about this series. The new 8GB RPi4 contains this HW
>>> design
>>> change and USB will not work without it. See this discussion on the
>>> downstream
>>> kernel github, where other OS/bootloaders are hitting the issue:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/issues/1402
>>>
>>> Otherwise, the Linux version of this is already in linux-next:
>>>
>>>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c?h=next-20200529&id=c65822fef4adc0ba40c37a47337376ce75f7a7bc
>>
>> We're already at 2020.07-rc3 , so unless this is a bugfix (does not look
>> that way), this will have to wait for next release cycle.
> 
> Of course. As long as it eventually gets in I'm happy (not implying this
> specific series is flawless, but the overall mechanism). I'm just worried this
> gets lost.
> 
>> Also, it seems
>> there was a lengthy ongoing discussion, is that already sorted out ?
> 
> Well, there was some discussion on how to incorporate the platform specific
> callback into XCHI's code. Which this revision of the series addresses. But,
> IIRC, that's pretty much it as far as discussion is concerned.

Oh, right, since the firmware loading hook looks like a reset hook, why
isn't that implemented via reset controller API instead ?