mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@gmail.com>
To: LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"Linux Kernel list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Locking in the (now generic) GPIO infrastructure?
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:00:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c384c5ea0806040400j35236d5fo3854ce2ed30cd755@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

compare void gpio_line_set() in

arch/arm/plat-iop/gpio.c:
void gpio_line_set(int line, int value)
{
	unsigned long flags;

	local_irq_save(flags);
	if (value == GPIO_LOW) {
		*IOP3XX_GPOD &= ~(1 << line);
	} else if (value == GPIO_HIGH) {
		*IOP3XX_GPOD |= 1 << line;
	}
	local_irq_restore(flags);
}

with

include/asm-arm/arch-ixp4xx/platform.h:
static inline void gpio_line_set(u8 line, int value)
{
	if (value == IXP4XX_GPIO_HIGH)
	    *IXP4XX_GPIO_GPOUTR |= (1 << line);
	else if (value == IXP4XX_GPIO_LOW)
	    *IXP4XX_GPIO_GPOUTR &= ~(1 << line);
}

Under a Linux kernel where multiple drivers are accessing GPIO, the
latter does not seem safe against preemption (assuming the memory
read-modify-write is not atomic).

Shouldn't GPIO access be protected against concurrent access here?

Documentation/gpio.txt does not really mention the locking mechanism
assumed to modify GPIO lines.

And I think I am running into an issue with this under -rt kernels,
but that needs more analysis from my side.

Regards,
-- 
Leon

             reply	other threads:[~2008-06-04 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-04 11:00 Leon Woestenberg [this message]
2008-06-06  8:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-06-06 10:28 ` Ben Dooks
2008-06-06 12:53 ` David Brownell
2008-06-06 19:23   ` Leon Woestenberg
2008-06-06 20:13     ` David Brownell
2008-06-07 11:52   ` Mikael Pettersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c384c5ea0806040400j35236d5fo3854ce2ed30cd755@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=leon.woestenberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®