From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@gmail.com>
To: LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Linux Kernel list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Locking in the (now generic) GPIO infrastructure?
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:00:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c384c5ea0806040400j35236d5fo3854ce2ed30cd755@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
compare void gpio_line_set() in
arch/arm/plat-iop/gpio.c:
void gpio_line_set(int line, int value)
{
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
if (value == GPIO_LOW) {
*IOP3XX_GPOD &= ~(1 << line);
} else if (value == GPIO_HIGH) {
*IOP3XX_GPOD |= 1 << line;
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
with
include/asm-arm/arch-ixp4xx/platform.h:
static inline void gpio_line_set(u8 line, int value)
{
if (value == IXP4XX_GPIO_HIGH)
*IXP4XX_GPIO_GPOUTR |= (1 << line);
else if (value == IXP4XX_GPIO_LOW)
*IXP4XX_GPIO_GPOUTR &= ~(1 << line);
}
Under a Linux kernel where multiple drivers are accessing GPIO, the
latter does not seem safe against preemption (assuming the memory
read-modify-write is not atomic).
Shouldn't GPIO access be protected against concurrent access here?
Documentation/gpio.txt does not really mention the locking mechanism
assumed to modify GPIO lines.
And I think I am running into an issue with this under -rt kernels,
but that needs more analysis from my side.
Regards,
--
Leon
next reply other threads:[~2008-06-04 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-04 11:00 Leon Woestenberg [this message]
2008-06-06 8:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-06-06 10:28 ` Ben Dooks
2008-06-06 12:53 ` David Brownell
2008-06-06 19:23 ` Leon Woestenberg
2008-06-06 20:13 ` David Brownell
2008-06-07 11:52 ` Mikael Pettersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c384c5ea0806040400j35236d5fo3854ce2ed30cd755@mail.gmail.com \
--to=leon.woestenberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®