From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, mimoja@mimoja.de, hewenliang4@huawei.com,
hushiyuan@huawei.com, luolongjun@huawei.com,
hejingxian@huawei.com, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com>,
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>,
simon.evans@bytedance.com, liangma@liangbit.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Parallel CPU bringup for x86_64
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:06:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c39ec509448e56f2002bd4ceef747b09dbf8a160.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C7F2481-0B0B-4399-A8E1-30731EFD02D2@zytor.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3299 bytes --]
On Wed, 2023-02-01 at 08:55 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> This should be a CPU bug flag in my option.
This is in the tree that I've just rebased to v6.2-rc6 for Usama to
continue testing and repost as appropriate.
(Oh, as I post it in email I realise we should probably retcon the
explicit check for AMD out of the previous patch in the series. You can
see it being *removed* in this patch.)
From 1f7cece1241e5b9c9988f943962155bb7154d4f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 09:53:26 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 07/15] x86/smpboot: Disable parallel boot for AMD CPUs
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 11 +++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 9 +++++++--
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
index 61012476d66e..ed7f32354edc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -466,5 +466,6 @@
#define X86_BUG_MMIO_UNKNOWN X86_BUG(26) /* CPU is too old and its MMIO Stale Data status is unknown */
#define X86_BUG_RETBLEED X86_BUG(27) /* CPU is affected by RETBleed */
#define X86_BUG_EIBRS_PBRSB X86_BUG(28) /* EIBRS is vulnerable to Post Barrier RSB Predictions */
+#define X86_BUG_NO_PARALLEL_BRINGUP X86_BUG(29) /* CPU has hardware issues with parallel AP bringup */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_CPUFEATURES_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index f769d6d08b43..19b5c8342d7e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -941,6 +941,17 @@ static void init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
case 0x19: init_amd_zn(c); break;
}
+ /*
+ * Various AMD CPUs appear to not to cope with APs being brought up
+ * in parallel. In debugging, the AP doesn't even seem to reach an
+ * outb to port 0x3f8 right at the top of the startup trampoline.
+ * We don't *think* there are any remaining software issues which
+ * may contribute to this, although it's possible. So far, attempts
+ * to get AMD to investigate this have been to no avail. So just
+ * disable parallel bring up for all AMD CPUs for now.
+ */
+ set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_NO_PARALLEL_BRINGUP);
+
/*
* Enable workaround for FXSAVE leak on CPUs
* without a XSaveErPtr feature
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 7920823d5a3b..95c182023d09 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1538,9 +1538,14 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
* it for all AMD CPUs to be on the safe side.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32) || boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level < 0x0B ||
- cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_STATE_ENCRYPT) ||
- boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
+ cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_STATE_ENCRYPT)) {
do_parallel_bringup = false;
+ }
+ if (do_parallel_bringup &&
+ boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_NO_PARALLEL_BRINGUP)) {
+ pr_info("Disabling parallel bringup due to CPU bugs\n");
+ do_parallel_bringup = false;
+ }
snp_set_wakeup_secondary_cpu();
}
--
2.39.0
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5965 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-02 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-01 20:53 David Woodhouse
2022-02-01 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] x86/apic/x2apic: Fix parallel handling of cluster_mask David Woodhouse
2022-02-01 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] cpu/hotplug: Move idle_thread_get() to <linux/smpboot.h> David Woodhouse
2022-02-01 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] cpu/hotplug: Add dynamic parallel bringup states before CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU David Woodhouse
2022-02-01 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] x86/smpboot: Reference count on smpboot_setup_warm_reset_vector() David Woodhouse
2022-02-01 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] x86/smpboot: Split up native_cpu_up into separate phases and document them David Woodhouse
2022-02-01 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] x86/smpboot: Support parallel startup of secondary CPUs David Woodhouse
2022-02-01 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] x86/smpboot: Send INIT/SIPI/SIPI to secondary CPUs in parallel David Woodhouse
2022-02-01 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] x86/mtrr: Avoid repeated save of MTRRs on boot-time CPU bringup David Woodhouse
2022-02-01 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] x86/smpboot: Serialize topology updates for secondary bringup David Woodhouse
2022-02-07 18:50 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Parallel CPU bringup for x86_64 Tom Lendacky
2023-02-01 14:40 ` Usama Arif
2023-02-01 15:08 ` David Woodhouse
2023-02-01 16:38 ` [External] " Usama Arif
2023-02-01 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2023-02-01 17:12 ` David Woodhouse
2023-02-02 10:06 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c39ec509448e56f2002bd4ceef747b09dbf8a160.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fam.zheng@bytedance.com \
--cc=hejingxian@huawei.com \
--cc=hewenliang4@huawei.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hushiyuan@huawei.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liangma@liangbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luolongjun@huawei.com \
--cc=mimoja@mimoja.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=simon.evans@bytedance.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=usama.arif@bytedance.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®