From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 470B4136349; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 01:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.221 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766021969; cv=none; b=WvVB1RfcrP1ZGK+CQhXDq0LRA2/GED3QYmul39UB/f5QuO5PgZU12W4KIPkfqhxm8+yAgb+dqcaw0WcWSQFHAovGuocgKcGgor1nB61mT21BwqaJ9OLZ2vGx535iIkS02Ms4S6EUBwud3SPOlDBB7vyZot3tYoTzMD0CS0ikf+0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766021969; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LHpKZINOAzoMRY1Yhcsk8YumfpkjFssqzQgKvDQwtuc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:CC:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=DWzlWeSFLjY8Kjd8WpH3OG/z+IrG/ylxAsAAFWZo5EgDgpjjedP+fVR4myYwjTWF4kIInvEPobDSI+Q2aeAV8bzyq/1fuXK9gOopAM1MNPe3YR6CXNq6JmFarPnoV7Sjm2I5lVfR8yfHe4JVk2W7z0FSWSWpOeCOkFDKGiUTnk0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=bI+d1Cr+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.221 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="bI+d1Cr+" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=rtNN3V6iHZLIfY324HvcuK2itKHY9ppnQFfTs7EuSXY=; b=bI+d1Cr+ZXG0IpG9cARQyIq7cGNQjxZLW+Sh2iZNJg7SKRsOR43yQa7/I61q/1Mep/cnRpuFA x+IwpYYIC89MdiajHHMwLL/eNBN06OdNR6RLCCOmvxLiGIZLTCjGRxBxVugDYXq6UTIrrR9/w0D O5dyx+GIouhXmsrMfPUm1sQ= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.194]) by canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dWtYK2604zRhRm; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:36:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemk100013.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.194.61]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2A5C1402CD; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:39:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.120.192] (10.67.120.192) by kwepemk100013.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:39:23 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:39:22 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 6/6] net: phy: motorcomm: fix duplex setting error for phy leds To: Andrew Lunn References: <20251215125705.1567527-1-shaojijie@huawei.com> <20251215125705.1567527-7-shaojijie@huawei.com> <143514a2-e538-47e2-920c-f223667cb900@huawei.com> <0bb9d5a1-e01c-4d7d-b668-3bf81e98447b@lunn.ch> From: Jijie Shao In-Reply-To: <0bb9d5a1-e01c-4d7d-b668-3bf81e98447b@lunn.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems200002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.68) To kwepemk100013.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.61) on 2025/12/17 21:49, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 09:05:20PM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote: >> on 2025/12/16 15:21, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 08:57:05PM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote: >>>> fix duplex setting error for phy leds >>>> >>>> Fixes: 355b82c54c12 ("net: phy: motorcomm: Add support for PHY LEDs on YT8521") >>>> Signed-off-by: Jijie Shao >>> Please don't mix new development and fixes in one patchset. Please >>> base this patch on net, and send it on its own. >>> >>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html >>> >>> Fixes are accepted any time, it does not matter about the merge >>> window. >>> >>> Andrew >> Yes, this is RFC, just for code review. >> I sent it to net when requesting a merge. > This is however a real fix. The motorcomm driver is broken. Why wait > to fix it? > > Andrew Alright, this patch shouldn't require an RFC and has no direct relation to this patch set. I'll send it directly to net. Thanks! Shao Jijie