From: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/debug: avoid executing show_state and causing rcu stall warning
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 16:58:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4058896-947d-c802-ac57-bf03eb986378@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yuo0U2aWUZRLBAsA@gmail.com>
> * Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> If the number of CPUs is large, "sysrq_sched_debug_show" will execute for
>> a long time. Every time I execute "echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger" on my
>> 128-core machine, the rcu stall warning will be triggered. Moreover,
>> sysrq_sched_debug_show does not need to be protected by rcu_read_lock,
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> and no rcu stall warning will appear after adjustment.
>>
> That doesn't mean it doesn't have to be protected by *any* lock - which
> your patch implements AFAICS.
>
> There's a couple of lines such as:
>
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
Hi,
Here I refer to the implementation of "sysrq_timer_list_show", and I
don't see any lock.
Maybe there is a problem with the implementation of "sysrq_timer_list_show".
Thanks
>
> ... which need to be protected against CPU hotplug events.
>
> I haven't checked any of the deeper code to see what RCU or other
> protection it may need, but clearly you didn't either ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-03 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 1:18 Liu Song
2022-08-03 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-03 8:58 ` Liu Song [this message]
2022-08-03 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-03 9:25 ` Liu Song
2022-08-03 12:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-08-03 14:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-03 17:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-03 17:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-03 17:13 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4058896-947d-c802-ac57-bf03eb986378@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=liusong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome