From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.17.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 008BF6F2E2; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.17.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719601403; cv=none; b=QJAL2jJ+NhNyraiRisRnPVWLqzrAJ/4uxkFl7k4LZg6a3YgwL00ma5ttkpKb9lYubxz5vSoa4umteFq80lHHAHFSCxm9S0XEetuc/Wf9nl0ZJ8vKLqX2OjIWhATAto634VTqE8eTfQc6SkgyLojHk+K/nWf+PINvdtGTuU3sGeM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719601403; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0uICK04EcBkilneERG6wnrmIvJb2XbKZRvZwWeRJhBU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=qA8l1WZp5sT0NHiNaPrYUP06iJEZgncoouK0nu6z80U61AKiAa9ZvMYXImbBSoori6L5rZvXfnVbq5wxWUfloulE4dOWCxXfn/zstotFa4XiEP2nNBrrsj2uofIeKiTFe/IDp9blsgF7Pe1UDCOiDmF+VRF4qzD8jcNH1CdAvHI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=markus.elfring@web.de header.b=LtaATfW9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.17.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=markus.elfring@web.de header.b="LtaATfW9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1719601374; x=1720206174; i=markus.elfring@web.de; bh=ADjl6HYwPE4fmEIQRqZxfeS3MwMxTa4HLg75Y0SxIFQ=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc: References:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:cc:content-transfer-encoding: content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject: to; b=LtaATfW9wk4gLt6AZc8vHwCfOgU6s3zVo4STy7h3Y3tsOzAPevLTAmIzrQr035WT Cfm1OdKUjmhYC2Ue8b9XYuq6wiCewCb8f0pzrIvF3OTKW8Cy4dZwd5Qxd9KlWgdOc I8uHIs1P/RRog0nb1RVbqqM9uTJ9b7wU8TODdjU0H1/Zm+txlFANPOsHPrBFcfO+Y 9z9TSJ96Y28xhZk/aCOH6TdSHyh8hIRoQa4KHRUaV0iSOqjOgpe895KvcQaCTDjmN Rlj16sCmD3dnIdHT65DC3GJW/JaEDcBkq0X59wIf1Filnk09/uU7vEcbt4CsMcV4q 8Dw0phVkG2t9tRiFkg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([94.31.91.95]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MBSB3-1sANdp0e6R-006WI1; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 21:02:54 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 21:02:53 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [v3] drm/nouveau: fix null pointer dereference in nouveau_connector_get_modes To: Lyude Paul , nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter , Danilo Krummrich , Dave Airlie , Karol Herbst Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML , David Airlie , Jonathan Cameron , Julia Lawall References: <20240627074204.3023776-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn> <790dbe8aee621b58ec0ef8d029106cb1c1830a31.camel@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-GB From: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:fNjEYGC1kGG0cm10RiO9/XQQ9wQYz9pp73x93aPWF/5vpTm2dxu Z37o/+6CdBZor0CYYoxPRzNdzOGjsFWfOIEZyFaU+FnWqDFs6aGw0ZiSHj3rtCMDFh6FS+D +3bLFoj6RTUIF3Ud4Ol0fz77ZNr/Gq1sEOIcthHm3VXkQ2RMoGxWBmX3FbfqemcZ2Yqnbnq wnBUevXfqGIFrkM2aw2rg== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:mlv8LWiymOc=;rEVPoNl4k/tPhkPXY7S3RXvPTAV 95mFDZ5dxJeItnSc2SPxs8FQL07nWI7/E/XXy3/bL/jyUUajobe+g0TPZS939tzv2nwut5FzR hqmuJlG+chYGovLStb5X2g1939vehPF5RvqCrhB2FFCCg9jpptYxcrQopR3+dYbaSVIRIkTlf VuPGKznOjJ9K1V7QIC+DZoSi8Rbn0qvsL0q4MMLOwaMi0Xs53lTp7kQmL8kYZCmsYUtGW2+Q8 zR0FaVIq94eyzjmCqb3NE+rLmQ9+IFuTwgEHQM82xrdqRmc70pyN/xWuZFAHPdDsgeCkhCWaR Z8nLm1mzun5FlgEOrDQZF6u/8GGfo1u98QJwvzjq4zysmgMX396/jv3SKrNSL27vyqyUN1IhH c48D4SkHE2eDQESRtIGOGDpdY9o5m6zPb894MRpkKW/TksY7Ro6r7aIdxQryrHe6aQPADnQIi jpp6t1ju4xVKTLzclUc2W46j80f1+AW4QjDsZF+9xAMEyA7G84z1CK+xRSvIEy73mytPw53uo WHZ9Niu6ynFxWHJdBppZEu5/g7Y+AdH4wqwfCHDAnXX2sWGGpQiTLdPwu4h2D27rTRefl5I9n 2eVUTNUTbzBmToGUNALfImfjbSvVOGI8xIgIULAhjy49xqqu4+6u7eqOCm6itW/GRDxQ/P5AV jbtNDHIS150dLkJ29YErJEWKhOAnvvhngKqSy1qn4JzBDmKGq+tE+q4NrfIvRSvIt0P+IYhEC Gtowg+yvSSPpSjawlqe7UwrI+bUxXkTbnaXYj+x4ZSDjWIpF47LiysjxonTX+4EeFvRT1svZU 9p4I2Iwb4GKo6tgpAx8W+pDefiomkcsOZIfQSA96Tfw2s= > Because the responses you have been given read like a bot, I find it interesting that you interpret provided information in such a direction. > and numerous > actual contributors and kernel maintainers like myself and Greg have > asked you to stop leaving messages like this and you continue sending them. I hope still that further information can be handled in constructive ways. > I promise you, maintainers are more then capable of being able to > tell a contributor when they need to improve the summary they've > provided in a git commit. There are usual possibilities. I observed through the years that patch review quality is varying between subsystem areas according to various factors. Regards, Markus