From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: reserve the memblock right after the kernel
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:29:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c435b3df-4e82-7c10-366a-5a3d1543c73f@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201110095503.GA10357@alpha.franken.de>
Hello Thomas,
On 10/11/2020 10:55, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
>>>> Linux doesn't own the memory immediately after the kernel image. On Octeon
>>>> bootloader places a shared structure right close after the kernel _end,
>>>> refer to "struct cvmx_bootinfo *octeon_bootinfo" in cavium-octeon/setup.c.
>>>>
>>>> If check_kernel_sections_mem() rounds the PFNs up, first memblock_alloc()
>>>> inside early_init_dt_alloc_memory_arch() <= device_tree_init() returns
>>>> memory block overlapping with the above octeon_bootinfo structure, which
>>>> is being overwritten afterwards.
>>> as this special for Octeon how about added the memblock_reserve
>>> in octen specific code ?
>> while the shared structure which is being corrupted is indeed Octeon-specific,
>> the wrong assumption that the memory right after the kernel can be allocated by memblock
>> allocator and re-used somewhere in Linux is in MIPS-generic check_kernel_sections_mem().
> ok, I see your point. IMHO this whole check_kernel_sections_mem() should
> be removed. IMHO memory adding should only be done my memory detection code.
>
> Could you send a patch, which removes check_kernel_section_mem completly ?
this will expose one issue:
platforms usually do it in a sane way, like it was done last 15 years, namely
add kernel image without non-complete pages on the boundaries.
This will lead to the situation, that request_resource() will fail at least
for .bss section of the kernel and it will not be properly displayed under
/proc/iomem (and probably same problem will appear, which initially motivated
the creation of check_kernel_section_mem()).
As I understood, the issue is that memblock API operates internally on the
page granularity (at least there are many ROUND_DOWN() inside for the size
or upper boundary), so for request_resource() to success one has to claim
the rest of the .bss last page. And with current memblock API
memblock_reserve() must appear somewhere, being this ARCH or platform code.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Sverdlin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-06 14:10 Alexander A Sverdlin
2020-11-07 9:40 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2020-11-09 10:34 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2020-11-09 11:08 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2020-11-10 9:55 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2020-11-10 10:29 ` Alexander Sverdlin [this message]
2020-11-11 14:52 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-13 2:30 ` Jiaxun Yang
2020-11-13 3:28 ` Jinyang He
2020-11-13 3:49 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-11-13 12:29 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2020-11-13 12:56 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2020-11-13 9:17 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2020-11-13 13:09 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2020-11-16 22:31 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-17 9:41 ` Alexander Sverdlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c435b3df-4e82-7c10-366a-5a3d1543c73f@nokia.com \
--to=alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulburton@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®