From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792618063; b=G8Q0Ex03hnFU3VrtYpNZY+d3vdL9VMfaIT7katiS/1UAbobqderJTszauMMqNN+GcLiH q/jGwMIYupW7jJikUVvMVfVUEw36ls1zELfXphOGHeRF7i3jVulxAA1bNy958nBil6RQf r+/SfqQMAMwRjNkkK9aRDVFvLpKFtmoNcFEowDLq7/Xk3JxEXiKAoinN2Nx0iM5Wp+04s ggZx6dyI8QcPC6sSpQw78ChVZhVJvCbtsXB1xPzmRaQYDZOKqSrI/35gGx3WtcZcDsHv/ Pa3i14uPX+zy79aXX7AmNHDa3G+FVm3N1JdNN1esXugdlLdnqGADOzSt6b97uzz822A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792618063; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=9Q79igMfokPbIn4EF3OHWsP3g9W63ebKo434jeW1LzM=; b=pTFkezw+9/OinRSS1kqeeIFze5wz7CRNjhuauqJ9IIkBIVLr3dtWJV4KmxowgLlbbeKe nz4aFjJOamOa8l5wBWyIMI7XB9gHEf02aM+PSEKCQ4Qj6LGwgU3fzTB7cyEWNwbF8eLAt k1x0G6+tvygGGSnrwZyM/DYTCuf4qdV0iMFlEjRIddd95W8XrMN+P3dE24TzAt8PHV0sG YMB54CCXtoka8RwZDJ97gC4CbY/FCYQboF/SSCBRGfUMTWdL2sjUMiJKbYLvodaQ5mE45 bmNlgXdTdjt/d5zsssZMq9EcfkcMfVqss3ccZW2roa66ShOJIu1AoXcLhWNL3Hin5Tw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=AYcBbpX2; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80DF6606A321 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 21:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=AYcBbpX2 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E30951F000C8; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 21:27:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792618063; bh=9Q79igMfokPbIn4EF3OHWsP3g9W63ebKo434jeW1LzM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=AYcBbpX2rk/d4fk4EfwD0tkZh3GQXUshFjLTTvFKk3ztvwgG/jtwWEXreKIiWiB7e 7K9SLcHWjszHxDrCfvCK/IGOVVmH+eaF+G8Vqws8zJEiGUcZr0gXZys55GP0S0LRbk FdYgVOHil5ybD+tcXBf0tqYRuykk1CfZEGrwrADfAuMIOVNDGGgL9p66CcYeZWPflI enswrK01qoHMxdvVzOoMJ45Z1++TGc6c2xrkBQIEj87sfdUQYTg0UgQD2qJtIOhVZr cse3InQfCYfHiOnsInKA2TjYoUmqPk/U1EMTeMH/tjUrQ0HPS6/wBM8N4g7rOSqtz2 okiW3/nJDc0hA== Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 11:27:41 -1000 Message-ID: From: Tejun Heo To: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com, Boris Brezillon , Bradley Morgan , Chia-I Wu , Liviu Dudau , Matthew Brost , Steven Price , Lai Jiangshan , Breno Leitao Subject: Re: [RFC v6.1 2/3] workqueue: Add support for real-time workers In-Reply-To: References: <20261001160711.59888-3-tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com> <20261001184848.61776-1-tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com> <3a139a32135c149f51bac4f2bd58ad56@kernel.org> <9bb46cf4-7982-463b-8289-06bbc319bba9@igalia.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, Tvrtko. On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 01:53:01PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > +static void > +sanitize_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq, > + struct workqueue_attrs *attrs) > +{ > + if (wq->flags & WQ_HIGHPRI) > + attrs->nice = HIGHPRI_NICE_LEVEL; WQ_HIGHPRI only sets the initial nice level, which can be changed afterwards, e.g. through sysfs. Forcing it here would silently override such changes. Maybe keep setting it at allocation instead? > Could you please confirm (or deny :)) this is what you had in mind? The rest sounds sane to me, but it's difficult to evaluate without looking at the patches. Can you please post them? Thanks. -- tejun