From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/6] cpumask: Implement cpumask_{first,next}_{nor,andnot}
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 16:49:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c494e91f-abb1-4d09-acec-a6003bf8270b@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zsjgjh1V3wf0gwbd@yury-ThinkPad>
On 2024-08-23 21:18, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 02:59:43PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Allow finding the first or next bit within two input cpumasks which is
>> either:
>>
>> - both zero and zero,
>> - respectively one and zero.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
>> ---
>> Changes since v0:
>> - Rename "notandnot" to "nor".
>> - Use __always_inline.
>> ---
>> include/linux/cpumask.h | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> index 23686bed441d..5573e75c13ec 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> @@ -204,6 +204,32 @@ unsigned int cpumask_first_and_and(const struct cpumask *srcp1,
>> cpumask_bits(srcp3), small_cpumask_bits);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * cpumask_first_andnot - return the first cpu from *srcp1 & ~*srcp2
>> + * @src1p: the first input
>> + * @src2p: the second input
>> + *
>> + * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus match in both.
>> + */
>> +static __always_inline
>> +unsigned int cpumask_first_andnot(const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask *srcp2)
>> +{
>> + return find_first_andnot_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp1), cpumask_bits(srcp2), nr_cpumask_bits);
>
>
> Here should be a small_cpumask_bits. This is better optimized for
> NR_CPUS < BITS_PER_LONG.
Will fix the 4 instances here for next round.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * cpumask_first_nor - return the first cpu from ~(*srcp1 | *srcp2)
>> + * @src1p: the first input
>> + * @src2p: the second input
>> + *
>> + * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus match in both.
>> + */
>> +static __always_inline
>> +unsigned int cpumask_first_nor(const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask *srcp2)
>> +{
>> + return find_first_nor_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp1), cpumask_bits(srcp2), nr_cpumask_bits);
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * cpumask_last - get the last CPU in a cpumask
>> * @srcp: - the cpumask pointer
>> @@ -246,6 +272,40 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
>> return find_next_zero_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp), small_cpumask_bits, n+1);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * cpumask_next_andnot - return the next cpu from *srcp1 & ~*srcp2
>> + * @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (ie. return will be > @n)
>> + * @src1p: the first input
>> + * @src2p: the second input
>> + *
>> + * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus match in both.
>> + */
>> +static __always_inline
>> +unsigned int cpumask_next_andnot(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask *srcp2)
>> +{
>> + /* -1 is a legal arg here. */
>> + if (n != -1)
>> + cpumask_check(n);
>> + return find_next_andnot_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp1), cpumask_bits(srcp2), nr_cpumask_bits, n+1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * cpumask_next_nor - return the next cpu from ~(*srcp1 | *srcp2)
>> + * @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (ie. return will be > @n)
>> + * @src1p: the first input
>> + * @src2p: the second input
>> + *
>> + * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus match in both.
>> + */
>> +static __always_inline
>> +unsigned int cpumask_next_nor(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask *srcp2)
>> +{
>> + /* -1 is a legal arg here. */
>> + if (n != -1)
>> + cpumask_check(n);
>> + return find_next_nor_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp1), cpumask_bits(srcp2), nr_cpumask_bits, n+1);
>> +}
>> +
>> #if NR_CPUS == 1
>> /* Uniprocessor: there is only one valid CPU */
>> static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
>> --
>> 2.39.2
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-23 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 18:59 [RFC PATCH v1 0/6] sched: NUMA-aware concurrency IDs Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-23 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/6] lib: Clarify comment on top of find_next_andnot_bit Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-23 19:20 ` Yury Norov
2024-08-23 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] lib: Implement find_{first,next,nth}_nor_bit, find_first_andnot_bit Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-23 19:19 ` Yury Norov
2024-08-23 20:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-28 18:24 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-28 18:41 ` Yury Norov
2024-08-23 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/6] cpumask: Implement cpumask_{first,next}_{nor,andnot} Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-23 19:18 ` Yury Norov
2024-08-23 20:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2024-08-23 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/6] sched: NUMA-aware per-memory-map concurrency IDs Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-23 20:14 ` Yury Norov
2024-08-23 20:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-23 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/6] selftests/rseq: x86: Implement rseq_load_u32_u32 Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-23 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v1 6/6] selftests/rseq: Implement NUMA node id vs mm_cid invariant test Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c494e91f-abb1-4d09-acec-a6003bf8270b@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®