From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815C6C7EE2E for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 16:38:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234816AbjFHQis (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2023 12:38:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47124 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234010AbjFHQim (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2023 12:38:42 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 013F63599; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:38:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B77764F06; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 16:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE13BC4339B; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 16:37:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1686242254; bh=oXUT5oQvjYSEjb3Lc/kuaZbdEGwNN5fuS6434CRKp8A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dSdOYNmAcsUQ36ZKmxctSbZhqqpGcUgQSExQgpAuI8Y7k0q4AJvJnXoh+d+KwlDcs VLdX0HCapLR6qKCNwW2x/psZc7hliH2QR4IeHkhA/nxWmdWHFZ/WTkMxSefYQZD5b0 7QEH4yyXzmwZRuH5CaYKeiTZcZSbAh+glQzpvAs2d+VOq8iJrGyMeD6cLPeKUD1ucv c4CKp7h25VVADQD5V94t6zarwL07gHx6XgSvQvcz7Gj/vLhjHH7rNx/5qaLXzNgHZ/ KWnTd8Z8KvSwcbElIVgrSVdJ6mVuh111Qd3e1hkqNuW4HIoWw0KFUmeCuSerHlPdJj fN7VYfwxo++Tg== Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4891ACE14DD; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:37:34 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Zhangjin Wu , thomas@t-8ch.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: nolibc patches, still possible for 6.5 ? Message-ID: Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <5494ac68-b4b9-434f-92c1-7e197c92a4ab@paulmck-laptop> <208b317e-8553-4d0d-b97c-a0e808fe98f2@paulmck-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 06:32:04AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 04:06:37PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 11:22:54PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 02:03:17PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > (There were some kernel test > > > > > > robot complaints as well, valid or not I am not sure.) > > > > > > > > > > You mean in relation with nolibc stuff (or nolibc-test) or something > > > > > totally different ? > > > > > > > > Apologies, this was me being confused and failing to look closely. > > > > > > > > The complaints were not about nolibc, but rather about my patches that > > > > they were on top of. Not your problem! > > > > > > Ah no problem :-) > > > > > > > And please let me know when the next batch from your tree are ready to go. > > > > (You might have been saying that they were in your recent emails, but > > > > I thought I should double-check.) > > > > > > No pb, I just sent it while you were writing and our emails have crossed :-) > > > > > > In short, it's ready now with branch 20230606-nolibc-rv32+stkp7a but if you > > > need any more info (more detailed summary, a public repost of the whole > > > series etc), just let me know. And I faced 2 kernel build errors on s390x > > > and riscv about rcu_task something, though you might be interested :-/ > > > > And I pulled them in and got this from "make run": > > > > 138 test(s) passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed.[ 2.416045] reboot: Power down > > > > And this from "make run-user": > > > > 136 test(s) passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /home/git/linux-rcu/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run.out > > > > And run.out looks as it has before, so all looks good at this end. > > > > Thus, unless you tell me otherwise, I will move these to my nolibc branch > > for the upcoming merge window. > > Perfect, thank you very much Paul! And done! Thanx, Paul