From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] scripts/checkpatch.pl: false positive missing parentheses
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 22:52:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4b8270a-ae2a-e234-faa8-d5366605865e@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51c4c2c53cf166b704fdf7e8f08b3f09dbece1ab.camel@perches.com>
On 05/07/2018 10:43 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 20:31 +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> This patch creates a false positive:
>> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
>>
>> Here we define a constant that can be used to initialize a structure.
>> Adding parentheses would lead to a compile time error:
>> error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
>> ---
>> foo.h | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 foo.h
>>
>> diff --git a/foo.h b/foo.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..e2cba533f065
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/foo.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2 */
>> +#define EFI_ST_DISK_IMG { 0x00003368, { \
>> + {0x00000d40, "\x6f\x63\x00\x2f\x2a\x00\x20\x2a"}, /* oc./*. * */ \
>> + {0x00000d48, "\x00\x20\x2a\x2f\x0a\x00\x09\x7b"}, /* . */...{ */ \
>
> I think this line would not do what you expect as the "/* . */" is
> a complete comment and the "...{ */" is parsed as code.
Thanks for catching this. If I replace the "internal" */ by ?/ the
problem does not occur. So probably we can close this issue.
So I think we can close the issue.
Best regards
Heinrich
>
>> + {0x00000d50, "\x30\x78\x25\x30\x38\x7a\x78\x2c"}, /* 0x%08zx, */ \
>> + {0x00000d58, "\x20\x22\x00\x5c\x78\x25\x30\x32"}, /* ".\x%02 */ \
>> + {0x00000d60, "\x78\x00\x20\x2a\x2f\x20\x5c\x00"}, /* x. */ \. */ \
>
> here too...
>
>> + {0, NULL} } }
>
> checkpatch will always be a stupid style checker.
>
> Some false positives are expected.
>
> I think this is one of them, but perhaps the bit of
> checkpatch logic in the COMPLEX_MACRO test could be
> improved by something like the below.
Do we have to consider something a macro with complex a
>
> Andy? What do you think?
>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 24618dffc5cb..9d3bdab03225 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -785,6 +785,8 @@ our $Typecast = qr{\s*(\(\s*$NonptrType\s*\)){0,1}\s*};
> # Any use must be runtime checked with $^V
>
> our $balanced_parens = qr/(\((?:[^\(\)]++|(?-1))*\))/;
> +our $balanced_braces = qr/(\{(?:[^\{\}]++|(?-1))*\})/;
> +our $balanced_brackets = qr/(\[(?:[^\[\]]++|(?-1))*\])/;
> our $LvalOrFunc = qr{((?:[\&\*]\s*)?$Lval)\s*($balanced_parens{0,1})\s*};
> our $FuncArg = qr{$Typecast{0,1}($LvalOrFunc|$Constant|$String)};
>
> @@ -4953,6 +4955,16 @@ sub process {
> $dstat =~ s/^\s*//s;
> $dstat =~ s/\s*$//s;
>
> + # Flatten any parentheses and braces using the
> + # fancy balanced_<foo> tests (perl v5.10+ only)
> + if ($^V && $^V ge 5.10.0) {
> + while ($dstat =~ s/$balanced_parens/1/ ||
> + $dstat =~ s/$balanced_braces/1/ ||
> + $dstat =~ s/$balanced_brackets/1/)
> + {
> + }
> + }
> +
> # Flatten any parentheses and braces
> while ($dstat =~ s/\([^\(\)]*\)/1/ ||
> $dstat =~ s/\{[^\{\}]*\}/1/ ||
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-07 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-07 18:31 Heinrich Schuchardt
2018-05-07 20:43 ` Joe Perches
2018-05-07 20:52 ` Heinrich Schuchardt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4b8270a-ae2a-e234-faa8-d5366605865e@gmx.de \
--to=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®