Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Ignore pending PV EOI if the vCPU has since disabled PV EOIs

["Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>]

On Wed, 2026-06-24 at 15:05 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Ignore KVM's internal "service pending PV EOI" request if the vCPU has
> disabled PV EOIs since the request was made.  Asserting that PV EOIs are
> enabled can fail if reading guest memory in pv_eoi_get_user() fails, i.e.
> if pv_eoi_test_and_clr_pending() bails early, *and* the vCPU also disables
> PV EOIs.
> 
>   kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c:3338!
>   Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>   CPU: 4 UID: 1000 PID: 890 Comm: pv_eoi_test Not tainted 7.0.0-d585aa5894d8-vm #337 PREEMPT
>   Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
>   RIP: 0010:kvm_lapic_sync_from_vapic+0x12b/0x140 [kvm]
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x1075/0x1c30 [kvm]
>    kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2d5/0x980 [kvm]
>    __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0
>    do_syscall_64+0xb5/0xb40
>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
>    </TASK>
>   Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass
>   ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> 
> Fixes: ae7a2a3fb6f8 ("KVM: host side for eoi optimization")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 6f30bbdddb5a..38bba9a1114c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -3371,6 +3371,12 @@ static void apic_sync_pv_eoi_from_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  					struct kvm_lapic *apic)
>  {
>  	int vector;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!pv_eoi_enabled(vcpu))) {
> +		__clear_bit(KVM_APIC_PV_EOI_PENDING, &vcpu->arch.apic_attention);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +

Do you think whether it's better to do this in kvm_lapic_set_pv_eoi(), i.e.,
when guest disables PV_EOI for this vCPU?  If we do so, it seems we can save the
unnecessary pv_eoi_set_pending() (which writes guest memory) called from
apic_sync_pv_eoi_to_guest(), or it's not possible to happen?

>  	/*
>  	 * PV EOI state is derived from KVM_APIC_PV_EOI_PENDING in host
>  	 * and KVM_PV_EOI_ENABLED in guest memory as follows:
> @@ -3382,8 +3388,6 @@ static void apic_sync_pv_eoi_from_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * KVM_APIC_PV_EOI_PENDING is set, KVM_PV_EOI_ENABLED is unset:
>  	 * 	-> host enabled PV EOI, guest executed EOI.
>  	 */
> -	BUG_ON(!pv_eoi_enabled(vcpu));
> -
>  	if (pv_eoi_test_and_clr_pending(vcpu))
>  		return;
>  	vector = apic_set_eoi(apic);
> 
> base-commit: 50406d35f5635e1cc523e61409d57e851b5f5df8

Anyway, the code LGTM:

Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>