From: "Zdenek Kabelac" <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
To: "Chris Snook" <csnook@redhat.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <pzijlstr@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Scheduler on C2D CPU and latest 2.6.27 kernel
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:29:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4e36d110810210429q55e959c5hcdf7bfad34cb1f57@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48FDB7E7.4090007@redhat.com>
2008/10/21 Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>:
> Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Recently I'm noticing bad behavior of the CPU scheduler on my T61 (2GB,
>> C2D)
>>
>> It looks like Linux concentrates all running tasks on one CPU and the
>> second cpu is sleeping.
>>
>> With recent changes to DRI - glxgears went up to 840FPS but also takes
>> 100% (with Xorg) and when I run 'while :; do true; done' loop in
>> parallel frame rate drops to 300FPS.
>>
>> But as I have C2D CPU I would expect that there should be no such
>> dramatic slowdown.
>>
>> Xosview shows that only one CPU is fully loaded.
>>
>> Here are my .config scheduler options:
>>
>> CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK=y
>> # CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED is not set
>> CONFIG_IOSCHED_NOOP=y
>> CONFIG_IOSCHED_AS=y
>> CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE=y
>> CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ=y
>> CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="cfq"
>> CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y
>> # CONFIG_SCHED_MC is not set
I've also tested SMT=n MC=y - with same result
>> CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK=y
>> # CONFIG_NET_SCHED is not set
>> CONFIG_USB_EHCI_TT_NEWSCHED=y
>> CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y
>> CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS=y
>> CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER=y
>>
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>
> You're running a loop that does nothing except create new tasks that have no
> scheduling history, and then disappear before the scheduler can migrate
> them.
>
> Try running 'openssl speed' to chew up CPU. I promise you the scheduler
> will behave very nicely.
Well - sorry you really shouldn't promise things you cannot guarantee.
It's obviously showing exactly same problem on my box.
And I should add that with 2.6.27-rc8 I do not experience this behavior.
Gears are showning 80% speed - but consumes only 25%
and bash loop or openssl speed task do not influence its speed.
(as expected with 2CPU machine)
Zdenek.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-21 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-21 9:59 Zdenek Kabelac
2008-10-21 11:07 ` Chris Snook
2008-10-21 11:29 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2008-10-21 11:42 ` Chris Snook
2008-10-21 11:58 ` Zdenek Kabelac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4e36d110810210429q55e959c5hcdf7bfad34cb1f57@mail.gmail.com \
--to=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
--cc=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pzijlstr@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®