From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Regression in suspend to ram in 2.6.31-rc kernels
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:53:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4e36d110909051253s5c5e9d96x3ebdc444231b5776@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iqfx5mss.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
2009/9/5 OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>:
> Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> 2009/9/4 OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>:
>>> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> Note that when you rever this patch on a current kernel you do actually
>>>> get different behvaviour than when going back to before this commit.
>>>>
>>>> In 2.6.30 we called ->write_super in the various sync functions and
>>>> then ->sync_fs, in 2.6.31-rc8 you would not call any syncing at all
>>>> anymore. I think this patch might just be a symptom for a situation
>>>> where the suspend code causes a sync and the mmc driver can't handle
>>>> it anymore.
>>
>> So - here is the console trace from suspend when I've added
>> dump_stack() to the fat_sync_fs() (and also added debug prints
>> around each call in this function -so its obvious the function is
>> actually left - but then it freezes later somewhere.)
>>
>> It's interesting that 3 calls to sync happens.
>
> It seems
>
> 1) sync() (probabry "sync" command)
> 2) sync as part of suspend sequence
> 3) sync_filesystem() by mmc remove event
>
> I guess the root-cause of the problem would be 3). However, it would not
> be easy to fix, at least, we would need to think about what we want to
> do for it. So, to workaround it for now, I've made this patch.
>
> Can you try whether this patch fixes this problem?
>
So I've tested your patch - it seems to fix the problem in suspend -
the machine sleeps - however after resume the mmc SD card becomes
unusable to the system and appended call trace filled my message log
very quickly:
After reboot the filesystem appeared to be usable again without errors.
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81134f6b>] __getblk+0x2cb/0x300
[<ffffffff813dcb58>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x80
[<ffffffff81135122>] __breadahead+0x12/0x40
[<ffffffffa0520cb7>] fat_count_free_clusters+0x307/0x320 [fat]
[<ffffffff81103a58>] ? check_object+0xd8/0x260
[<ffffffff8107d83d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffffa0522d55>] fat_statfs+0xf5/0x110 [fat]
[<ffffffff8110be5c>] vfs_statfs+0x7c/0xa0
[<ffffffff8110c0b0>] vfs_statfs_native+0x20/0xb0
[<ffffffff8110c243>] sys_statfs+0x73/0xb0
[<ffffffff8122ab2b>] ? __up_write+0xcb/0x120
[<ffffffff8100c18c>] ? sysret_check+0x27/0x62
[<ffffffff8109eb8b>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x28b/0x2b0
[<ffffffff8107d7ed>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x15d/0x1a0
[<ffffffff813dbf1e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[<ffffffff8100c15b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
getblk(): invalid block size 512 requested
logical block size: 27499
[<ffffffff81135122>] __breadahead+0x12/0x40
[<ffffffffa0520cb7>] fat_count_free_clusters+0x307/0x320 [fat]
[<ffffffff81103a58>] ? check_object+0xd8/0x260
[<ffffffff8107d83d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffffa0522d55>] fat_statfs+0xf5/0x110 [fat]
[<ffffffff8110be5c>] vfs_statfs+0x7c/0xa0
[<ffffffff8110c0b0>] vfs_statfs_native+0x20/0xb0
[<ffffffff8110c243>] sys_statfs+0x73/0xb0
[<ffffffff8122ab2b>] ? __up_write+0xcb/0x120
[<ffffffff8100c18c>] ? sysret_check+0x27/0x62
[<ffffffff8109eb8b>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x28b/0x2b0
[<ffffffff8107d7ed>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x15d/0x1a0
[<ffffffff813dbf1e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[<ffffffff8100c15b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Zdenek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-05 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 11:51 Zdenek Kabelac
2009-08-31 19:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-01 9:34 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 22:29 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 23:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-04 0:47 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-04 9:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-05 17:22 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-05 19:53 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2009-09-05 22:42 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-08 8:10 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-09 13:15 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-07 12:51 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-09 13:21 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-10 19:23 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 6:39 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-11 20:09 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 21:14 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-11 21:32 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 21:45 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-11 21:51 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14 20:05 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-09-14 20:25 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:29 ` Chris Ball
2009-09-11 22:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14 8:39 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-14 19:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14 20:27 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-18 11:15 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-18 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-11 22:22 ` Chris Ball
2009-09-11 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-11 22:21 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 19:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-08 19:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-09 13:52 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4e36d110909051253s5c5e9d96x3ebdc444231b5776@mail.gmail.com \
--to=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®