mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Regression in suspend to ram in 2.6.31-rc kernels
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:53:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4e36d110909051253s5c5e9d96x3ebdc444231b5776@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iqfx5mss.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>

2009/9/5 OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>:
> Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> 2009/9/4 OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>:
>>> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> Note that when you rever this patch on a current kernel you do actually
>>>> get different behvaviour than when going back to before this commit.
>>>>
>>>> In 2.6.30 we called ->write_super in the various sync functions and
>>>> then ->sync_fs, in 2.6.31-rc8 you would not call any syncing at all
>>>> anymore.  I think this patch might just be a symptom for a situation
>>>> where the suspend code causes a sync and the mmc driver can't handle
>>>> it anymore.
>>
>> So - here is the console trace from suspend when I've added
>> dump_stack() to the fat_sync_fs()   (and also added debug prints
>> around each call in this function -so its obvious the function is
>> actually left - but then it freezes later somewhere.)
>>
>> It's interesting that 3 calls to sync happens.
>
> It seems
>
>    1) sync() (probabry "sync" command)
>    2) sync as part of suspend sequence
>    3) sync_filesystem() by mmc remove event
>
> I guess the root-cause of the problem would be 3). However, it would not
> be easy to fix, at least, we would need to think about what we want to
> do for it. So, to workaround it for now, I've made this patch.
>
> Can you try whether this patch fixes this problem?
>

So I've tested your patch - it seems to fix the problem in suspend -
the machine sleeps - however after resume the mmc SD card becomes
unusable to the system and appended call trace filled my message log
very quickly:

After reboot the filesystem appeared to be usable again without errors.

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81134f6b>] __getblk+0x2cb/0x300
 [<ffffffff813dcb58>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x80
 [<ffffffff81135122>] __breadahead+0x12/0x40
 [<ffffffffa0520cb7>] fat_count_free_clusters+0x307/0x320 [fat]
 [<ffffffff81103a58>] ? check_object+0xd8/0x260
 [<ffffffff8107d83d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
 [<ffffffffa0522d55>] fat_statfs+0xf5/0x110 [fat]
 [<ffffffff8110be5c>] vfs_statfs+0x7c/0xa0
 [<ffffffff8110c0b0>] vfs_statfs_native+0x20/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8110c243>] sys_statfs+0x73/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8122ab2b>] ? __up_write+0xcb/0x120
 [<ffffffff8100c18c>] ? sysret_check+0x27/0x62
 [<ffffffff8109eb8b>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x28b/0x2b0
 [<ffffffff8107d7ed>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x15d/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff813dbf1e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
 [<ffffffff8100c15b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
getblk(): invalid block size 512 requested
logical block size: 27499

 [<ffffffff81135122>] __breadahead+0x12/0x40
 [<ffffffffa0520cb7>] fat_count_free_clusters+0x307/0x320 [fat]
 [<ffffffff81103a58>] ? check_object+0xd8/0x260
 [<ffffffff8107d83d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
 [<ffffffffa0522d55>] fat_statfs+0xf5/0x110 [fat]
 [<ffffffff8110be5c>] vfs_statfs+0x7c/0xa0
 [<ffffffff8110c0b0>] vfs_statfs_native+0x20/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8110c243>] sys_statfs+0x73/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8122ab2b>] ? __up_write+0xcb/0x120
 [<ffffffff8100c18c>] ? sysret_check+0x27/0x62
 [<ffffffff8109eb8b>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x28b/0x2b0
 [<ffffffff8107d7ed>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x15d/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff813dbf1e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
 [<ffffffff8100c15b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Zdenek

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-05 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-31 11:51 Zdenek Kabelac
2009-08-31 19:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-01  9:34   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 22:29     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 23:23       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-04  0:47         ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-04  9:13           ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-05 17:22             ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-05 19:53               ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2009-09-05 22:42                 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-08  8:10                   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-09 13:15                     ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-07 12:51               ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-09 13:21                 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-10 19:23                   ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11  6:39                     ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-11 20:09                       ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 21:14                         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-11 21:32                           ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 21:45                             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-11 21:51                               ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:22                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14 20:05                                 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-09-14 20:25                                   ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:29                               ` Chris Ball
2009-09-11 22:36                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14  8:39                                   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-14 19:17                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14 20:27                                     ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-18 11:15                                   ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-18 21:39                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-11 22:22                           ` Chris Ball
2009-09-11 22:04                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-11 22:21                         ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:32                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 19:06           ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-08 19:48             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-09 13:52             ` OGAWA Hirofumi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c4e36d110909051253s5c5e9d96x3ebdc444231b5776@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®