From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
mbroz@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing blk_trace_remove_sysfs to be in pair with blk_trace_init_sysfs
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:26:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4e36d110909240326k16bf40cdpfa4b818d1a24a25f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ABAC663.60906@cn.fujitsu.com>
2009/9/24 Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>:
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] Add missing blk_trace_remove_sysfs to be in pair with
>>>> blk_trace_init_sysfs
>>>> From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> Adds missing blk_trace_remove_sysfs() to be in pair with
>>>> blk_trace_init_sysfs() introduced in commit
>>>> 1d54ad6da9192fed5dd3b60224d9f2dfea0dcd82.
>>>>
>>>> Problem was noticed via kmemleak backtrace when some sysfs entries
>>>> were note properly destroyed during device removal:
>>>>
>>> Thanks for reporting and fixing this!
>>>
>>>> @@ -465,6 +466,7 @@ void blk_unregister_queue(struct gendisk *disk)
>>>>
>>>> kobject_uevent(&q->kobj, KOBJ_REMOVE);
>>>> kobject_del(&q->kobj);
>>>> + blk_trace_remove_sysfs(disk_to_dev(disk));
>>> This should be moved outside of 'if'.
>>>
>>
>> I was not really sure about the proper place - if it could be placed
>> before if() or after the if(){} - as I've not checked in depth
>
> Just use the reverse order against blk_register_queue() should be fine.
Yes - I think the order of release is correct.
>
>> connection between kobj and sysfs. It's somewhat unclear why all the
>> kobject operation are only within this if(){} block - so I've thought
>> there is some reason...
>> IMHO only elv_unregister_queue() should be probably in the if(){} block.
>>
>
> Seems it's a bug to put kobject_put(dev->kobj) in the if block.
>
> I created a stacked device (mdadm) and kmemleak still reported leaks
> even after I fixed the blktrace issue. And then I moved kobejct_put()
> outside the if, no more leaks reports.
>
Ok - I didn't have a testcase where the request_fn would be NULL.
So in this case I propose this patch:
---
Add missing blk_trace_remove_sysfs to be in pair with blk_trace_init_sysfs
introduced in commit 1d54ad6da9192fed5dd3b60224d9f2dfea0dcd82.
Release kobject also in case the request_fn is NULL.
Problem was noticed via kmemleak backtrace when some sysfs entries were
note properly destroyed during device removal:
unreferenced object 0xffff88001aa76640 (size 80):
comm "lvcreate", pid 2120, jiffies 4294885144
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0 65 a7 1a 00 88 ff ff .........e......
90 66 a7 1a 00 88 ff ff 86 1d 53 81 ff ff ff ff .f........S.....
backtrace:
[<ffffffff813f9cc6>] kmemleak_alloc+0x26/0x60
[<ffffffff8111d693>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x133/0x1c0
[<ffffffff81195891>] sysfs_new_dirent+0x41/0x120
[<ffffffff81194b0c>] sysfs_add_file_mode+0x3c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81197c81>] internal_create_group+0xc1/0x1a0
[<ffffffff81197d93>] sysfs_create_group+0x13/0x20
[<ffffffff810d8004>] blk_trace_init_sysfs+0x14/0x20
[<ffffffff8123f45c>] blk_register_queue+0x3c/0xf0
[<ffffffff812447e4>] add_disk+0x94/0x160
[<ffffffffa00d8b08>] dm_create+0x598/0x6e0 [dm_mod]
[<ffffffffa00de951>] dev_create+0x51/0x350 [dm_mod]
[<ffffffffa00de823>] ctl_ioctl+0x1a3/0x240 [dm_mod]
[<ffffffffa00de8f2>] dm_compat_ctl_ioctl+0x12/0x20 [dm_mod]
[<ffffffff81177bfd>] compat_sys_ioctl+0xcd/0x4f0
[<ffffffff81036ed8>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x2c
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
Signed-off-by: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-sysfs.c | 11 ++++++-----
include/linux/blktrace_api.h | 2 ++
kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
index b78c9c3..8a6d81a 100644
--- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
@@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ int blk_register_queue(struct gendisk *disk)
if (ret) {
kobject_uevent(&q->kobj, KOBJ_REMOVE);
kobject_del(&q->kobj);
+ blk_trace_remove_sysfs(disk_to_dev(disk));
return ret;
}
@@ -465,11 +466,11 @@ void blk_unregister_queue(struct gendisk *disk)
if (WARN_ON(!q))
return;
- if (q->request_fn) {
+ if (q->request_fn)
elv_unregister_queue(q);
- kobject_uevent(&q->kobj, KOBJ_REMOVE);
- kobject_del(&q->kobj);
- kobject_put(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj);
- }
+ kobject_uevent(&q->kobj, KOBJ_REMOVE);
+ kobject_del(&q->kobj);
+ blk_trace_remove_sysfs(disk_to_dev(disk));
+ kobject_put(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/blktrace_api.h b/include/linux/blktrace_api.h
index 7e4350e..622939a 100644
--- a/include/linux/blktrace_api.h
+++ b/include/linux/blktrace_api.h
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ extern int blk_trace_setup(struct request_queue
*q, char *name, dev_t dev,
char __user *arg);
extern int blk_trace_startstop(struct request_queue *q, int start);
extern int blk_trace_remove(struct request_queue *q);
+extern void blk_trace_remove_sysfs(struct device *dev);
extern int blk_trace_init_sysfs(struct device *dev);
extern struct attribute_group blk_trace_attr_group;
@@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ extern struct attribute_group blk_trace_attr_group;
# define blk_trace_startstop(q, start) (-ENOTTY)
# define blk_trace_remove(q) (-ENOTTY)
# define blk_add_trace_msg(q, fmt, ...) do { } while (0)
+# define blk_trace_remove_sysfs(struct device *dev) do { } while (0)
static inline int blk_trace_init_sysfs(struct device *dev)
{
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
index 3eb159c..60b5c5a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
@@ -1657,6 +1657,11 @@ int blk_trace_init_sysfs(struct device *dev)
return sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, &blk_trace_attr_group);
}
+void blk_trace_remove_sysfs(struct device *dev)
+{
+ sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &blk_trace_attr_group);
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE */
#ifdef CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING
--
1.6.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-24 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-21 10:07 Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-22 6:09 ` Li Zefan
2009-09-22 7:57 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-24 1:07 ` Li Zefan
2009-09-24 10:26 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2009-09-25 0:59 ` Li Zefan
2009-09-25 4:16 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4e36d110909240326k16bf40cdpfa4b818d1a24a25f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®