From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: check for null sk before deferencing it via the call to sock_net
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:32:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c50ebff0-233c-7dcf-1b80-19ac0369803a@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+5PVA7fJfZmN-XLuqARGkWL6eY54HaRAj19K_Und3K7vAVfpg@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/16/2017 06:37 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/08/2017 05:02 PM, Colin King wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>>
>>> The assignment of net via call sock_net will dereference sk. This
>>> is performed before a sanity null check on sk, so there could be
>>> a potential null dereference on the sock_net call if sk is null.
>>> Fix this by assigning net after the sk null check. Also replace
>>> the sk == NULL with the more usual !sk idiom.
>>>
>>> Detected by CoverityScan CID#1431862 ("Dereference before null check")
>>>
>>> Fixes: 384317ef4187 ("can: network namespace support for CAN_BCM
>>> protocol")
>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
>
> I don't see this one queued up in the net or net-next trees. Did it
> fall through the cracks or did it get queued up elsewhere? Seems like
> it's a good candidate to get into 4.14?
It definitely is!
Marc is our responsible guy for CAN related upstreams - but he seems to
be busy as I already poked him here:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=150771819505097&w=2
If he doesn't send a pull request by beginning of next week, I would ask
Dave to grab these patches - to get them into 4.14.
Best regards,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-16 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-08 15:02 Colin King
2017-09-08 17:46 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2017-10-16 16:37 ` Josh Boyer
2017-10-16 17:32 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2017-10-17 5:49 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c50ebff0-233c-7dcf-1b80-19ac0369803a@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®