mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>,
	Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: Fix PID tracing when perf is run in an init PID namespace
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:59:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c519631b-e02f-438c-a61f-68fa97583668@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93e822b1-76d1-454b-a42f-adf9292d4da6@arm.com>

On 08/10/2024 07:52, Leo Yan wrote:
> On 10/7/2024 9:05 PM, Leo Yan wrote:
>>
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 03:13:56PM +0200, Julien Meunier wrote:
>>> The previous implementation limited the tracing capabilities when perf
>>> was run in the init PID namespace, making it impossible to trace
>>> applications in non-init PID namespaces.
>>>
>>> This update improves the tracing process by verifying the event owner.
>>> This allows us to determine whether the user has the necessary
>>> permissions to trace the application.
>>
>> The original commit aab473867fed is not for constraint permission. It is
>> about PID namespace mismatching issue.
>>
>> E.g. Perf runs in non-root namespace, thus it records process info in the
>> non-root PID namespace. On the other hand, Arm CoreSight traces PID for
>> root namespace, as a result, it will lead mess when decoding.
>>
>> With this change, I am not convinced that Arm CoreSight can trace PID for
>> non-root PID namespace. Seems to me, the concerned issue is still existed
>> - it might cause PID mismatching issue between hardware trace data and
>> Perf's process info.
> 
> I thought again and found I was wrong with above conclusion. This patch is a
> good fixing for the perf running in root namespace to profile programs in
> non-root namespace. Sorry for noise.
> 
> Maybe it is good to improve a bit comments to avoid confusion. See below.
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>>> index bf01f01964cf..8365307b1aec 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>>> @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ static int etm4_parse_event_config(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>>>
>>>        /* Only trace contextID when runs in root PID namespace */
> 
> We can claim the requirement for the *tool* running in root PID namespae.
> 
>    /* Only trace contextID when the tool runs in root PID namespace */

minor nit: I wouldn't call "tool". Let keep it "event owner".

	/* Only trace contextID when the event owner is in root PID namespace */


Julien,

Please could you respin the patch with the comments addressed.

Kind regards
Suzuki


> 
> 
>>>        if ((attr->config & BIT(ETM_OPT_CTXTID)) &&
>>> -         task_is_in_init_pid_ns(current))
>>> +         task_is_in_init_pid_ns(event->owner))
>>>                /* bit[6], Context ID tracing bit */
>>>                config->cfg |= TRCCONFIGR_CID;
>>>
>>> @@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ static int etm4_parse_event_config(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>>>                        goto out;
>>>                }
>>>                /* Only trace virtual contextID when runs in root PID namespace */
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>    /* Only trace virtual contextID when the tool runs in root PID namespace */
> 
> With above change:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
> 
>>> -             if (task_is_in_init_pid_ns(current))
>>> +             if (task_is_in_init_pid_ns(event->owner))
>>>                        config->cfg |= TRCCONFIGR_VMID | TRCCONFIGR_VMIDOPT;
>>>        }
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.34.1
>>>
>>>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-08  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-25 13:13 Julien Meunier
2024-10-07 12:38 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-10-07 20:05 ` Leo Yan
2024-10-08  6:52   ` Leo Yan
2024-10-08  9:59     ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2024-10-08 13:18       ` Julien Meunier
2024-10-08 20:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Julien Meunier
2024-10-13 14:55   ` Leo Yan
2024-10-21 12:31   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-10-25 17:56     ` Julien Meunier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c519631b-e02f-438c-a61f-68fa97583668@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=julien.meunier@nokia.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®